BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17346766)

  • 1. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production.
    Jermann D; Pronk W; Meylan S; Boller M
    Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(8):1713-22. PubMed ID: 17346766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of interactions between NOM and particles on UF fouling mechanisms.
    Jermann D; Pronk W; Kägi R; Halbeisen M; Boller M
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3870-8. PubMed ID: 18715606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterising humic acid fouling of nanofiltration membranes using bisphenol A as a molecular indicator.
    Nghiem LD; Vogel D; Khan S
    Water Res; 2008 Sep; 42(15):4049-58. PubMed ID: 18678386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of UF membrane fouling mechanisms caused by organic interactions in seawater.
    Resosudarmo A; Ye Y; Le-Clech P; Chen V
    Water Res; 2013 Feb; 47(2):911-21. PubMed ID: 23219388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrafiltration behaviors of alginate blocks at various calcium concentrations.
    Meng S; Winters H; Liu Y
    Water Res; 2015 Oct; 83():248-57. PubMed ID: 26164659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrafiltration membrane fouling by extracellular organic matters (EOM) of Microcystis aeruginosa in stationary phase: influences of interfacial characteristics of foulants and fouling mechanisms.
    Qu F; Liang H; Wang Z; Wang H; Yu H; Li G
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(5):1490-500. PubMed ID: 22178303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Shao J; Hou J; Song H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fouling behavior of typical organic foulants in polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes: characterization from microforces.
    Wang L; Miao R; Wang X; Lv Y; Meng X; Yang Y; Huang D; Feng L; Liu Z; Ju K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(8):3708-14. PubMed ID: 23528200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of membrane fouling in ultrafiltration using model organic compounds.
    Kweon JH; Lawler DF
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):101-6. PubMed ID: 16003967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The removal of typical pollutants in secondary effluent by the combined process of powdered activated carbon-ultrafiltration.
    Sun L; He N; Yu T; Duan X; Feng C; Zhang Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 75(5-6):1485-1493. PubMed ID: 28333064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of organic and colloidal fouling on the removal of sulphamethoxazole by nanofiltration membranes.
    Nghiem LD; Espendiller C; Braun G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 18653950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fouling mechanisms in the integrated system with softening and ultrafiltration.
    Kweon JH; Lawler DF
    Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(19):4164-72. PubMed ID: 15491664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward osmosis filtration for removal of organic foulants: Effects of combined tannic and alginic acids.
    Wang L; Zhang W; Chu H; Dong B
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():251-63. PubMed ID: 26803261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
    Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-performance thin-layer hydrogel composite membranes for ultrafiltration of natural organic matter.
    Susanto H; Ulbricht M
    Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2827-35. PubMed ID: 18342907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dye or humic acid water treatment and membrane fouling by polyaluminum chloride composited with sodium alginate in coagulation-ultrafiltration process.
    Wang Y; Zhang F; Chu Y; Gao B; Yue Q
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(10):2202-9. PubMed ID: 23676389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mutual influences between natural organic matter and inorganic particles and their combined effect on ultrafiltration membrane fouling.
    Jermann D; Pronk W; Boller M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Dec; 42(24):9129-36. PubMed ID: 19174882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nanofiltration membrane fouling by oppositely charged macromolecules: investigation on flux behavior, foulant mass deposition, and solute rejection.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):8941-7. PubMed ID: 21928796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.