481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17348345)
1. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pay-for-performance: Medicare's new reimbursement twist.
Miller-Meeks M
Iowa Med; 2007; 97(1):8. PubMed ID: 17444298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring quality: an important tool in ensuring top notch home health care.
Waters RJ
Caring; 2007 Aug; 26(8):54, 56. PubMed ID: 17966308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New CMS 'error' rule has access implications.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Nov; 15(11):173-5. PubMed ID: 17982835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Providers: more pay in P4P. CMS says higher incentive opportunities possible.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Sep; 38(37):8-9. PubMed ID: 18810821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare evaluates pay-for-performance.
Fine A
Manag Care Q; 2006; 14(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 17590974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Money matters...but not when it comes to improving quality: study.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2007 Jun; 37(24):9. PubMed ID: 17608111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality measures gain importance as CMS moves to value-based purchasing.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Aug; 15(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 17691253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Doc resistance. Quality reporting initiative may be too cumbersome.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(22):10-1. PubMed ID: 17612021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. CMS rule raises bar on quality.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2011 Sep; 36(9):97-9. PubMed ID: 21942141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. P4P money slow to come groups disagree with CMS' methodology, results.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Aug; 38(33):8-9. PubMed ID: 18780450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. P4P--the next generation. Providers need to be involved in designing new incentive payment programs.
Norling R
Mod Healthc; 2006 Nov; 36(46):20. PubMed ID: 17153788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "P4P"--a force to be reckoned with.
Kahn C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):12. PubMed ID: 16075769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. P4P lessons learned.
Dominik D
Health Data Manag; 2008 Dec; 16(12):56. PubMed ID: 19140552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pay-for-performance incentives: are you missing out on revenue?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Oct; 30(10):133-6. PubMed ID: 16218299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Insurers look to CMS' lead. Major players likely to follow rule on preventable errors.
Vesely R
Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):20. PubMed ID: 17960703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CMS tries cash this time. New quality reporting program has financial incentives.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(15):12-3. PubMed ID: 17494350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. VBP: considering the worst case scenario.
Alexander J
Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Jan; 62(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 18351248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
