BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17348524)

  • 1. Physiological detection of interaural phase differences.
    Ross B; Tremblay KL; Picton TW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1017-27. PubMed ID: 17348524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus psychoacoustical measures.
    Zhou J; Durrant JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1508-15. PubMed ID: 14514204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
    Ross B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Desynchronisation of auditory steady-state responses related to changes in interaural phase differences: an objective measure of binaural hearing.
    Vercammen C; van Wieringen A; Wouters J; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jul; 56(7):464-471. PubMed ID: 28635497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
    Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
    Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of click frequency bands to the human binaural interaction components.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):321-7. PubMed ID: 10582533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation.
    Lazzouni L; Ross B; Voss P; Lepore F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 20005163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
    Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural derivation of sound source location: resolution of spatial ambiguities in binaural cues.
    Brainard MS; Knudsen EI; Esterly SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1015-27. PubMed ID: 1556303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus that are sensitive to interaural delays of amplitude-modulated tones: evidence for dual binaural influences.
    Batra R; Kuwada S; Stanford TR
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 8395589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.
    Sammeth CA; Brown AD; Greene NT; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108839. PubMed ID: 37429100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging in binaural hearing begins in mid-life: evidence from cortical auditory-evoked responses to changes in interaural phase.
    Ross B; Fujioka T; Tremblay KL; Picton TW
    J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 27(42):11172-8. PubMed ID: 17942712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contribution of high frequencies to human brain activity underlying horizontal localization of natural spatial sounds.
    Leino S; May PJ; Alku P; Liikkanen LA; Tiitinen H
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 8():78. PubMed ID: 17897443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
    Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.