These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17348537)

  • 41. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Audio-visual speech perception is special.
    Tuomainen J; Andersen TS; Tiippana K; Sams M
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B13-22. PubMed ID: 15833302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Desai S; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):428-40. PubMed ID: 18177171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of broad auditory tuning on across-frequency integration of speech patterns.
    Healy EW; Carson KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1087-95. PubMed ID: 20689025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Kelly WJ; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 2359269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Auditory and visual cueing of the [+/- rounded] feature of vowels.
    Lisker L; Rossi M
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():391-417. PubMed ID: 1339920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bochner JH; Snell KB; MacKenzie DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):493-500. PubMed ID: 3170942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Cohen JI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):884-97. PubMed ID: 25698021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.