These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17348551)

  • 1. Discrimination of starting phase with sinusoidal envelope modulation.
    Sheft S; Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):EL84-9. PubMed ID: 17348551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.
    Bashford JA; Warren RM; Brown CA
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 8935895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral restoration of speech: intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps.
    Warren RM; Hainsworth KR; Brubaker BS; Bashford JA; Healy EW
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 9055622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
    McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of temporal auditory processing in childhood: Changes in efficiency rather than temporal-modulation selectivity.
    Cabrera L; Varnet L; Buss E; Rosen S; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2415. PubMed ID: 31672005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of modulator asynchrony of sinusoidal and noise modulators on frequency and amplitude modulation detection interference.
    Gockel H; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2975-84. PubMed ID: 12509019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Room and head coloration can induce obligatory stream segregation.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 24993189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second-order temporal modulation transfer functions.
    Lorenzi C; Soares C; Vonner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1030-8. PubMed ID: 11519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2127-37. PubMed ID: 20968383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.
    Ewert SD; Verhey JL; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2921-31. PubMed ID: 12509013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators.
    Verhey JL; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2135-46. PubMed ID: 14587611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual relevance of the temporal envelope to the speech signal in the 4-7 kHz band.
    Kim KT; Choi JY; Kang HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL88. PubMed ID: 17927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.