546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17349438)
1. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.
Rosman AS; Korsten MA
Am J Med; 2007 Mar; 120(3):203-210.e4. PubMed ID: 17349438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [CT colonography: a new method for detecting colorectal cancer and polyps].
Ringstad G; Holmquist H; Brabrand K; Aaløkken TM; Hauge T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1470-3. PubMed ID: 16732340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomography colonography, and colonoscopy.
Smith LA; Sidhu P; Sidhu S; Rembacken B
Am J Med; 2008 Jan; 121(1):e7; author reply e9. PubMed ID: 18187060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility.
Ginnerup Pedersen B; Christiansen TE; Bjerregaard NC; Ljungmann K; Laurberg S
Endoscopy; 2003 Sep; 35(9):736-42. PubMed ID: 12929020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R
Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical significance of virtual colonoscopy (CT colonography) with special reference to polyp morphology.
Kawamura YJ; Sasaki J; Okamaoto H; Okamoto S; Kobayashi Y; Tanaka O; Konishi F
Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1686-8. PubMed ID: 15532805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps.
Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; Wilson LA; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup DM; Ahlquist DA
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Apr; 2(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 15067626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography with 64-slice MDCT compared to endoscopic colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after colorectal cancer resection.
Amitai MM; Fidder H; Avidan B; Portnoy O; Apter S; Konen E; Hertz M
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 19857803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finding polyps at colonoscopy previously noted on CT colonography.
Waye JD
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Apr; 20(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 20451818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Burling D; Bassett P; Bartram CI
Clin Radiol; 2005 Feb; 60(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 15664575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam.
Cornett D; Barancin C; Roeder B; Reichelderfer M; Frick T; Gopal D; Kim D; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor A; Pfau P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 103(8):2068-74. PubMed ID: 18564114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography.
Mulhall BP; Veerappan GR; Jackson JL
Ann Intern Med; 2005 Apr; 142(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 15838071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Virtual CT colonoscopy and virtual CT barium enema using multidetector-row CT].
Lee SJ
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 48(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 17060716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.
Sosna J; Morrin MM; Kruskal JB; Lavin PT; Rosen MP; Raptopoulos V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1593-8. PubMed ID: 14627580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
