These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17350262)
1. Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity? Ciatto S; Houssami N Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 17350262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery. Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management]. Kocjan G Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Present-day diagnostic techniques in breast nodes]. Sovtsov SA; Mikhaĭlova SA Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(10):42-6. PubMed ID: 9864803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The treatment of clinically silent breast lesions]. Woźniczko I; Dabrowski M; Dabrowska M; Powazka P Wiad Lek; 2005; 58(1-2):62-6. PubMed ID: 15991555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer. Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of referring physician specialty and practice type on referral for image-guided breast biopsy. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Gareen IF J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 17411865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical diagnosis of early breast cancer]. Ueno E; Tohno E; Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Aiyoshi Y; Morishima I; Ishikawa T; Fukasawa M; Yazawa T; Yashiro T Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Jun; 21 Suppl 2():140-7. PubMed ID: 8037476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical application of localized biopsy on breast microcalcification]. Wang J; Wang X; Liang JW; Gao JD; Bai XF Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 45(13):881-2. PubMed ID: 17953830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lipoma of the breast: a diagnostic dilemma. Lanng C; Eriksen BØ; Hoffmann J Breast; 2004 Oct; 13(5):408-11. PubMed ID: 15454196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy. Wai CJ; Al-Mubarak G; Homer MJ; Goldkamp A; Samenfeld-Specht M; Lee Y; Logvinenko T; Rothschild JG; Graham RA Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):850-5. PubMed ID: 23104707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions. Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of digital infrared imaging for breast cancer detection in women undergoing breast biopsy. Wishart GC; Campisi M; Boswell M; Chapman D; Shackleton V; Iddles S; Hallett A; Britton PD Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 20452740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value. Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Axillary staging by percutaneous biopsy: sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy. Rao R; Lilley L; Andrews V; Radford L; Ulissey M Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 19263171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New approaches to the imaging, diagnosis, and biopsy of breast lesions. Esserman LJ Cancer J; 2002; 8 Suppl 1():S1-14. PubMed ID: 12075695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]