These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17350775)

  • 1. The influence of noise type and level upon stochastic resonance in human audition.
    Ries DT
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):136-43. PubMed ID: 17350775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suprathreshold stochastic resonance in visual signal detection.
    Sasaki H; Sakane S; Ishida T; Todorokihara M; Kitamura T; Aoki R
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 18565603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of ambient acoustic noise on the auditory steady-state response thresholds in normally hearing adults.
    Kei J; Smith D; Joseph S; Stopa J; Kang S; Darnell R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17715465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity.
    Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical ratios in harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) for tonal signals between 0.315 and 150 kHz in random Gaussian white noise.
    Kastelein RA; Wensveen PJ; Hoek L; Au WW; Terhune JM; de Jong CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1588. PubMed ID: 19739772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of the kurtosis statistic in evaluating complex noise exposures for the protection of hearing.
    Davis RI; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 19657275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coincidence-enhanced stochastic resonance: experimental evidence challenges the psychophysical theory behind stochastic resonance.
    Perez CA; Cohn TE; Medina LE; Donoso JR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Aug; 424(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 17709194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gaussian-noise discrimination and its relation to auditory object formation.
    Goossens T; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3882-93. PubMed ID: 19507971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastic resonance in auditory steady-state responses in a magnetoencephalogram.
    Tanaka K; Kawakatsu M; Nemoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2104-10. PubMed ID: 18621581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of envelope statistics reveals evidence of sub-clinical hearing damage in a noise-exposed population with 'normal' hearing thresholds.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Greenish H
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 47(12):737-50. PubMed ID: 19085398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM(2)/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults.
    D'haenens W; Dhooge I; De Vel E; Maes L; Bockstael A; Vinck BM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):399-406. PubMed ID: 17654081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
    Xu Y; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial dissociation of changes of level and signal-to-noise ratio in auditory cortex for tones in noise.
    Ernst SM; Verhey JL; Uppenkamp S
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 18722535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of auditory noise on the psychophysical detection of visual signals: cross-modal stochastic resonance.
    Manjarrez E; Mendez I; Martinez L; Flores A; Mirasso CR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 415(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 17276601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2245-54. PubMed ID: 17902860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.