1235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17350857)
1. Allografts for aortic valve or root replacement: insights from an 18-year single-center prospective follow-up study.
Takkenberg JJ; Klieverik LM; Bekkers JA; Kappetein AP; Roos JW; Eijkemans MJ; Bogers AJ
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):851-9. PubMed ID: 17350857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experience with stentless aortic xenografts.
Luciani GB; Auriemma S; Casali G; Barozzi L; Lamascese N; Mazzucco A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 11128787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in young adults: is patient profile more important than prosthesis type?
Klieverik LM; Noorlander M; Takkenberg JJ; Kappetein AP; Bekkers JA; van Herwerden LA; Bogers AJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):479-87; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 16901039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-operations for aortic allograft root failure: experience from a 21-year single-center prospective follow-up study.
Bekkers JA; Klieverik LM; Raap GB; Takkenberg JJ; Bogers AJ
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 21227717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis for aortic calcified stenosis: 18-year experience with 1133 patients.
Aupart MR; Mirza A; Meurisse YA; Sirinelli AL; Neville PH; Marchand MA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Nov; 15(6):768-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 17152784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A single-institution experience with the Ross operation over 11 years.
Böhm JO; Hemmer W; Rein JG; Horke A; Roser D; Blumenstock G; Botha CA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 87(2):514-20. PubMed ID: 19161770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
Jamieson WR; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Lichtenstein SV; Fradet GJ; Janusz MT
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valve-related events after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved aortic homografts.
Kaya A; Schepens MA; Morshuis WJ; Heijmen RH; Brutel de la Riviere A; Dossche KM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 May; 79(5):1491-5. PubMed ID: 15854921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Structural valve deterioration of aortic bioprostheses and reoperation in octogenarians. Results and risk factors for survival].
Eitz T; Zittermann A; Fritzsche D; Kleikamp G; Körtke H; Körfer R
Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):699-703. PubMed ID: 17072786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.
Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival.
Houel R; Le Besnerais P; Soustelle C; Kirsch M; Hillion ML; Loisance D
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):368-74; discussion 374-5. PubMed ID: 10461235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midterm outcome after aortic root replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses.
Ennker IC; Albert A; Dalladaku F; Rosendahl U; Ennker J; Florath I
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 21277220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors.
Minami K; Boethig D; Mirow N; Kleikamp G; Koertke H; Godehardt E; Koerfer R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 10678383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
