124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17351426)
1. In vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla on clonogenic ability, proliferation, and cell cycle in human embryonic lung fibroblasts.
Schwenzer NF; Bantleon R; Maurer B; Kehlbach R; Herberts T; Claussen CD; Rodegerdts E
Invest Radiol; 2007 Apr; 42(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 17351426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do static or time-varying magnetic fields in magnetic resonance imaging (3.0 T) alter protein-gene expression?-A study on human embryonic lung fibroblasts.
Schwenzer NF; Bantleon R; Maurer B; Kehlbach R; Schraml C; Claussen CD; Rodegerdts E
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1210-5. PubMed ID: 17969170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No influence of magnetic fields on cell cycle progression using conditions relevant for patients during MRI.
Schiffer IB; Schreiber WG; Graf R; Schreiber EM; Jung D; Rose DM; Hehn M; Gebhard S; Sagemüller J; Spiess HW; Oesch F; Thelen M; Hengstler JG
Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 May; 24(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 12696084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA 8 T guideline: sodium imaging at 9.4 T does not affect vital signs or cognitive ability.
Atkinson IC; Renteria L; Burd H; Pliskin NH; Thulborn KR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1222-7. PubMed ID: 17969172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversible effect of MR and ELF magnetic fields (0.5 T and 0.5 mT) on human lymphocyte activation patterns.
Salerno S; La Mendola C; Lo Casto A; Mamone G; Caccamo N; Cardinale AE; Salerno A
Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Feb; 82(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 16546906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human fetal lung fibroblasts: in vitro study of repetitive magnetic field exposure at 0.2, 1.0, and 1.5 T.
Wiskirchen J; Grönewäller EF; Heinzelmann F; Kehlbach R; Rodegerdts E; Wittau M; Rodemann HP; Claussen CD; Duda SH
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 10831711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro evaluation of teratogenic effects by time-varying MR gradient fields on fetal human fibroblasts.
Rodegerdts EA; Grönewäller EF; Kehlbach R; Roth P; Wiskirchen J; Gebert R; Claussen CD; Duda SH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Jul; 12(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 10931574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genotoxic effects of 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in cultured human lymphocytes.
Lee JW; Kim MS; Kim YJ; Choi YJ; Lee Y; Chung HW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2011 Oct; 32(7):535-42. PubMed ID: 21412810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acute and chronic effects of exposure to a 1-mT magnetic field on the cytoskeleton, stress proteins, and proliferation of astroglial cells in culture.
Bodega G; Forcada I; Suárez I; Fernández B
Environ Res; 2005 Jul; 98(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 15910790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [ECG changes caused by the effect of static magnetic fields of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography using magnets with a field power of 0.5 to 4.0 Telsa].
Weikl A; Moshage W; Hentschel D; Schittenhelm R; Bachmann K
Z Kardiol; 1989 Sep; 78(9):578-86. PubMed ID: 2815912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on eye development in the C57BL/6J mouse.
Tyndall DA; Sulik KK
Teratology; 1991 Mar; 43(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 2014488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term effects of repetitive exposure to a static magnetic field (1.5 T) on proliferation of human fetal lung fibroblasts.
Wiskirchen J; Groenewaeller EF; Kehlbach R; Heinzelmann F; Wittau M; Rodemann HP; Claussen CD; Duda SH
Magn Reson Med; 1999 Mar; 41(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 10204867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure to a MRI-type high-strength static magnetic field stimulates megakaryocytic/erythroid hematopoiesis in CD34+ cells from human placental and umbilical cord blood.
Monzen S; Takahashi K; Toki T; Ito E; Sakurai T; Miyakoshi J; Kashiwakura I
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 May; 30(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19241445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: observer preference study and lesion contrast using five different pulse sequences.
Fink C; Puderbach M; Biederer J; Fabel M; Dietrich O; Kauczor HU; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 17507808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
Glover PM; Bowtell R
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphologic and dynamic renal imaging with assessment of glomerular filtration rate in a pcy-mouse model using a clinical 3.0 Tesla scanner.
Sadick M; Schock D; Kraenzlin B; Gretz N; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):469-75. PubMed ID: 19465861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?
Hill DL; McLeish K; Keevil SF
Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 16099687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
