176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17351699)
1. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury.
Lund ML; Fisher AG; Lexell J; Bernspång B
J Rehabil Med; 2007 Mar; 39(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 17351699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease.
Franchignoni F; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Guglielmi V; Picco D
Eura Medicophys; 2007 Dec; 43(4):451-61. PubMed ID: 18084167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and assessment of a community follow-up questionnaire for the Rick Hansen spinal cord injury registry.
Noreau L; Cobb J; Bélanger LM; Dvorak MF; Leblond J; Noonan VK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Sep; 94(9):1753-65. PubMed ID: 23529142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.
van der Zee CH; Post MW; Brinkhof MW; Wagenaar RC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24008052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)-development and psychometric evaluation.
Lindberg J; Kreuter M; Person LO; Taft C
Spinal Cord; 2013 Nov; 51(11):838-42. PubMed ID: 24042990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceived participation and problems in participation are determinants of life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury.
Lund ML; Nordlund A; Bernspång B; Lexell J
Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Sep; 29(18):1417-22. PubMed ID: 17729088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Questionnaire impact on participation and autonomy (IPA)].
Opara JA; Mehlich K; Bielecki A
Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(1-3):58-61. PubMed ID: 18717045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury.
Larsson Lund M; Nordlund A; Nygård L; Lexell J; Bernspång B
J Rehabil Med; 2005 Jan; 37(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 15788326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA): PSYChometric evaluation of the Persian version to use for persons with stroke.
Fallahpour M; Jonsson H; Joghataei MT; Kottorp A
Scand J Occup Ther; 2011 Mar; 18(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 20331392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the validity of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions.
Noonan VK; Kopec JA; Noreau L; Singer J; Mâsse LC; Zhang H; Dvorak MF
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Sep; 42(8):724-34. PubMed ID: 20809054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric properties of the Nottwil Environmental Factors Inventory Short Form.
Ballert CS; Post MW; Brinkhof MW; Reinhardt JD;
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 96(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 25264112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population.
Wolf AC; Tate RL; Lannin NA; Middleton J; Lane-Brown A; Cameron ID
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Sep; 44(9):747-55. PubMed ID: 22854805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the reliability of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions.
Noonan VK; Kopec JA; Noreau L; Singer J; Mâsse LC; Dvorak MF
J Rehabil Med; 2010 Sep; 42(8):735-43. PubMed ID: 20809055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: applicability to the UK spinal cord injured population.
Glass CA; Tesio L; Itzkovich M; Soni BM; Silva P; Mecci M; Chadwick R; el Masry W; Osman A; Savic G; Gardner B; Bergström E; Catz A
J Rehabil Med; 2009 Sep; 41(9):723-8. PubMed ID: 19774305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tracking functional status across the spinal cord injury lifespan: linking pediatric and adult patient-reported outcome scores.
Tian F; Ni P; Mulcahey MJ; Hambleton RK; Tulsky D; Haley SM; Jette AM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 95(11):2078-2085.e15. PubMed ID: 24933214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ABLE scale: the development and psychometric properties of an outcome measure for the spinal cord injury population.
Ardolino EM; Hutchinson KJ; Pinto Zipp G; Clark M; Harkema SJ
Phys Ther; 2012 Aug; 92(8):1046-54. PubMed ID: 22577065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rasch modeling and the measurement of social participation.
Dumont C; Bertrand R; Fougeyrollas P; Gervais M
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(4):309-25. PubMed ID: 14523252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: Validation of a new scale in a UK population.
Sibley A; Kersten P; Ward CD; White B; Mehta R; George S
Clin Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 20(9):793-803. PubMed ID: 17005503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with spinal cord injury.
Raichle KA; Osborne TL; Jensen MP; Cardenas D
J Pain; 2006 Mar; 7(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 16516823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving measurement properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 with rating scale analysis.
Williams RT; Heinemann AW; Bode RK; Wilson CS; Fann JR; Tate DG
Rehabil Psychol; 2009 May; 54(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 19469610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
