151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17351933)
1. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.
Miller FS; Nagel LE; Kenny-Moynihan MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of ThinPrep Imaging System in detecting low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Zhang FF; Banks HW; Langford SM; Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 May; 131(5):773-6. PubMed ID: 17488164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.
Tanaka K; Aoki D; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Takamatsu K; Nakamura M; Tsunoda H; Seino S; Kobayashi N; Shirayama T; Takahashi F
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 32535593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology.
Lozano R
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16959306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Papanicolaou tests with mixed high-grade and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion features: distinct performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology.
Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Styer P; Schwartz M; Ducatman B; Colgan TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Apr; 130(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 16594738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Negative computer-imaged ThinPrep Pap test and positive hybrid capture2 HPV co-testing results: A quality assurance review.
Rao R; Molina D; Halligan AM; Vakil B; Alperstein SA; Hoda RS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Sep; 43(9):763-9. PubMed ID: 26173579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytologic features of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in thinprep papanicolaou test slides and conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Dubray-Benstein B; Haja J; Hughes JH;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jan; 129(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15628904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion? Concordance Between the Interpretation of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Papanicolaou Tests: Results From the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.
Crothers BA; Ghofrani M; Zhao C; Dodd LG; Goodrich K; Husain M; Kurtycz DFI; Russell DK; Shen RZ; Souers RJ; Staats PN; Tabatabai ZL; Witt BL; Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Jan; 143(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30133317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False-positive Papanicolaou (PAP) test rates in the College of American Pathologists PAP education and PAP proficiency test programs: evaluation of false-positive responses of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or cancer to a negative reference diagnosis.
Crothers BA; Booth CN; Darragh TM; Zhao C; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Moriarty AT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 May; 138(5):613-9. PubMed ID: 24786119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9022723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep® automated thin-layer liquid-based cytology Papanicolaou slide preparation and BestCyte® cell sorter imaging system.
Delga A; Goffin F; Kridelka F; Marée R; Lambert C; Delvenne P
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 25277345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
Dziura B; Quinn S; Richard K
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 16780026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral contraceptive pills are associated with artifacts in ThinPrep Pap smears that mimic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Morrison C; Prokorym P; Piquero C; Wakely PE; Nuovo GJ
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 12704686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cytotechnologists' and cytopathologists' ASCUS rates preimplementation and postimplementation of the ThinPrep® imaging system.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 43(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 24962256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
