These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17351943)

  • 1. Endocervical component in conventional cervical smears: influence on detection of squamous cytologic abnormalities.
    Ribeiro AA; Santos Sdo C; de Souza e Silva SR; Nascimento MA; Fonsechi-Carvasan GA; Carneiro MA; Rabelo-Santos M; Rabelo-Santos SH
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 17351943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of the endocervical Cytobrush sample to the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
    Luzzatto R; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(6):1143-7. PubMed ID: 8960020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
    Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
    Yang M; Zachariah S
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The detection of endocervical gland involvement by high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in smears prepared from endocervical brush specimens.
    Van Hoeven KH; Hanau CA; Hudock JA
    Cytopathology; 1996 Oct; 7(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 8911754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients with epithelial cell abnormality in PAP smears: correlation of results with follow-up smears and cervical biopsies.
    Türkmen IÇ; Başsüllü N; Korkmaz P; Günenç B; Baykal CM; Güdücü N; Işçı H; Dünder I; Doğusoy GB
    Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24022307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of endocervical curettage in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or atypical squamous cells of unknown significance on Pap smear.
    Miranda AD; Rodríguez R; Novoa DM; Rojas A; Pachón A; DiazGranados CA
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Jul; 10(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 16829753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of smears obtained by cervical scraping and an endocervical swab in the diagnosis of neoplastic disease of the uterine cervix.
    Johansen P; Arffmann E; Pallesen G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endocervical and metaplastic cells: comparison of endocervical and metaplastic cell number in Papanicolaou smears with and without squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Izadi Mood N; Mozaffari Miandoab H
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 16610685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The PapSpin: a reasonable alternative to other, more expensive liquid-based Papanicolaou tests.
    Rosenthal DL; Geddes S; Trimble CL; Carson KA; Alli PM
    Cancer; 2006 Jun; 108(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 16628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
    Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The immediate postconization endocervical smear: evaluation of its utility in the detection of residual dysplasia.
    Frauchiger WL; De Frias DV; Cajulis RS; Yu GH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(5):1139-43. PubMed ID: 9755671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
    Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis.
    Lee KR; Manna EA; St John T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atypical squamous cells and low squamous intraepithelial lesions in postmenopausal women: implications for management.
    Piccoli R; Mandato VD; Lavitola G; Acunzo G; Bifulco G; Tommaselli GA; Attianese W; Nappi C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Oct; 140(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 18603346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.