BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17352021)

  • 21. Unsedated transnasal laryngo-esophagogastroduodenoscopy: an alternative to conventional endoscopy.
    Shaker R; Saeian K
    Am J Med; 2001 Dec; 111 Suppl 8A():153S-156S. PubMed ID: 11749942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transnasal esogastroduodenoscopy (EGD): comparison with conventional EGD and new applications.
    Maffei M; Dumonceau JM
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2008 Nov; 138(45-46):658-64. PubMed ID: 19043813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a Canadian experience in daily practice.
    Cho S; Arya N; Swan K; Cirocco M; Kandel G; Kortan P; Marcon N
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 22(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 18354752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.
    Craig A; Hanlon J; Dent J; Schoeman M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):292-6. PubMed ID: 10049410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A pilot study assessing tolerance safety and feasibility of diagnostic transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy using an improved larger caliber endoscope and an adapted topical anesthesia.
    Balassone V; Dauri M; Cappuccio R; Di Camillo M; Benavoli D; Buonomo O; Petrella G; Stroppa I
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Oct; 29(10):3002-9. PubMed ID: 25515980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the effects on cardiopulmonary function of ultrathin transnasal versus normal diameter transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan.
    Kawai T; Miyazaki I; Yagi K; Kataoka M; Kawakami K; Yamagishi T; Sofuni A; Itoi T; Moriyasu F; Osaka Y; Takagi Y; Aoki T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):770-4. PubMed ID: 17591059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective? A randomized trial.
    Trevisani L; Sartori S; Gaudenzi P; Gilli G; Matarese G; Gullini S; Abbasciano V
    World J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 10(22):3313-7. PubMed ID: 15484307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
    Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Ultra-thin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy].
    Kawai T; Yamamoto K; Fukuzawa M; Sakai Y; Moriyasu F
    Nihon Rinsho; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1264-7. PubMed ID: 20662204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
    Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
    Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
    Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
    Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Utility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy for pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A prospective study to assess cardiopulmonary function.
    Tsuboi M; Arai M; Maruoka D; Matsumura T; Nakagawa T; Katsuno T; Yokosuka O
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):884-9. PubMed ID: 23731392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
    Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Garcia RT; Cello JP; Nguyen MH; Rogers SJ; Rodas A; Trinh HN; Stollman NH; Schlueck G; McQuaid KR
    Gastroenterology; 2003 Dec; 125(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 14724812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance.
    Dumortier J; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY; Moulinier B; Zarka F; Paliard P; Lambert R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):285-91. PubMed ID: 10049409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices.
    Pungpapong S; Keaveny A; Raimondo M; Dickson R; Woodward T; Harnois D; Wallace M
    Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 17583856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
    Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrathin endoscope flexibility can predict discomfort associated with unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Ono S; Niimi K; Fujishiro M; Nakao T; Suzuki K; Ohike Y; Kodashima S; Yamamichi N; Yamazaki T; Koike K
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jul; 5(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 23858379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
    Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
    Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.