These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17352549)

  • 1. Under what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Mar; 43(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 17352549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditions under which children experience inhibitory difficulty with a "button-press" go/no-go task.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16325846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response.
    Diamond A; Kirkham N; Amso D
    Dev Psychol; 2002 May; 38(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 12005379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brief report: manipulation of task difficulty in inhibitory control tasks.
    Lindqvist S; Thorell LB
    Child Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18608218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of arm weight on C-not-B task performance: implications for the motor inhibitory deficit account of search failures.
    Rivière J; Lécuyer R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 May; 100(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18313688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prepotency in action: does children's knowledge of an artifact affect their ability to inhibit acting on it?
    Simpson A; Carroll DJ; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Feb; 118():127-33. PubMed ID: 24045015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood.
    Eigsti IM; Zayas V; Mischel W; Shoda Y; Ayduk O; Dadlani MB; Davidson MC; Lawrence Aber J; Casey BJ
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jun; 17(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 16771797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Under what conditions do children have difficulty in inhibiting imitation? Evidence for the importance of planning specific responses.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Aug; 109(4):512-24. PubMed ID: 21458827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Go or no-go? Developmental improvements in the efficiency of response inhibition in mid-childhood.
    Cragg L; Nation K
    Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):819-27. PubMed ID: 19046150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gravity is not the only ruler for falling events: Young children stop making the gravity error after receiving additional perceptual information about the tubes mechanism.
    Bascandziev I; Harris PL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Aug; 109(4):468-77. PubMed ID: 21497828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms of belief-desire reasoning. Inhibition and bias.
    Friedman O; Leslie AM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Aug; 15(8):547-52. PubMed ID: 15271000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac timing and the central regulation of action.
    Jennings JR; van der Molen MW
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 12466930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of attentional processes in ADHD and normal children.
    Gupta R; Kar BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():259-76. PubMed ID: 19733762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibitory motor control in apneic and insomniac patients: a stop task study.
    Sagaspe P; Philip P; Schwartz S
    J Sleep Res; 2007 Dec; 16(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 18036083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What makes the windows task difficult for young children: rule inference or rule use?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ; Simon M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Feb; 87(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 14757069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interference control in a new rule use task: age-related changes, labeling, and attention.
    Müller U; Zelazo PD; Hood S; Leone T; Rohrer L
    Child Dev; 2004; 75(5):1594-609. PubMed ID: 15369533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do dogs (Canis familiaris) understand invisible displacement?
    Collier-Baker E; Davis JM; Suddendorf T
    J Comp Psychol; 2004 Dec; 118(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 15584779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.