361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17352611)
1. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tse CS; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):495-513. PubMed ID: 18444751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency: the influence of local and list-wide prime relatedness.
Scaltritti M; Balota DA; Peressotti F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 22906041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming.
Lacruz I; Folk J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1261-84. PubMed ID: 15513246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of phonological and whole-word treatments for two contrasting cases of developmental dyslexia.
Rouse HJ; Wilshire CE
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 24(8):817-42. PubMed ID: 18277451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models.
Ziegler JC; Jacobs AM; Klüppel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):547-59. PubMed ID: 11424645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.
Estes WK; Maddox WT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1003-18. PubMed ID: 12450328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.
Besner D; Wartak S; Robidoux S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 18248152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.
O'Malley S; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1400-11. PubMed ID: 18980404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.
Masson ME; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):898-914. PubMed ID: 22774856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.
McCann RS; Remington RW; Van Selst M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1352-70. PubMed ID: 10946719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.
Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Aguilera L; Owen WJ; Sears CR
Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):433-43. PubMed ID: 17258186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
