These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17352624)

  • 1. Independent retrieval of source dimensions: an extension of results by Starns and Hicks (2005) and a comment on the ACSIM measure.
    Vogt V; Bröder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):443-50. PubMed ID: 17352624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.
    Perlman A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A measurement theory of illusory conjunctions.
    Prinzmetal W; Ivry RB; Beck D; Shimizu N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):251-69. PubMed ID: 11999853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1213-20. PubMed ID: 16393041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):303-23. PubMed ID: 18473661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.
    Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
    Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination.
    DeCarlo LT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):767-78. PubMed ID: 14516212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Look who's talking! Facial appearance can bias source monitoring.
    Nash RA; Bryer OM; Schlaghecken F
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 20408040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can attentional theory explain the inverse base rate effect? Comment on Kruschke (2001).
    Winman A; Wennerholm P; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1390-5; discussion 1396-1400. PubMed ID: 14622069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999).
    Qin J; Raye CL; Johnson MK; Mitchell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1110-5. PubMed ID: 11486922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory without awareness: pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching to sample.
    Sutton JE; Shettleworth SJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):266-82. PubMed ID: 18426309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory.
    Stahl C; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):570-86. PubMed ID: 18444757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fine-grained sensitivity to statistical information in adult word learning.
    Vouloumanos A
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):729-42. PubMed ID: 17950721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focused attention on one contextual attribute does not reduce source memory for a different attribute.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI
    Memory; 2004 Mar; 12(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 15250183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.