230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17353668)
1. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased power of microarray analysis by use of an algorithm based on a multivariate procedure.
Krohn K; Eszlinger M; Paschke R; Roeder I; Schuster E
Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(17):3530-4. PubMed ID: 15998661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
Lai Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microarray experimental design: power and sample size considerations.
Yang MC; Yang JJ; McIndoe RA; She JX
Physiol Genomics; 2003 Dec; 16(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 14532333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing for trends in dose-response microarray experiments: a comparison of several testing procedures, multiplicity and resampling-based inference.
Lin D; Shkedy Z; Yekutieli D; Burzykowski T; Göhlmann HW; De Bondt A; Perera T; Geerts T; Bijnens L
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article26. PubMed ID: 18052909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative trait Loci analysis using the false discovery rate.
Benjamini Y; Yekutieli D
Genetics; 2005 Oct; 171(2):783-90. PubMed ID: 15956674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding sample size: what determines the required number of microarrays for an experiment?
Jørstad TS; Langaas M; Bones AM
Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Feb; 12(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 17229587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harnessing the power of gene microarrays for the study of brain aging and Alzheimer's disease: statistical reliability and functional correlation.
Blalock EM; Chen KC; Stromberg AJ; Norris CM; Kadish I; Kraner SD; Porter NM; Landfield PW
Ageing Res Rev; 2005 Nov; 4(4):481-512. PubMed ID: 16257272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size calculation for multiple testing in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH; Bang H; Young S
Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 15618534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical review of published microarray studies for cancer outcome and guidelines on statistical analysis and reporting.
Dupuy A; Simon RM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jan; 99(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 17227998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection and validation of normalization methods for c-DNA microarrays using within-array replications.
Fan J; Niu Y
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2391-8. PubMed ID: 17660210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample size calculation with dependence adjustment for FDR-control in microarray studies.
Shao Y; Tseng CH
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4219-37. PubMed ID: 17328091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
