108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354701)
1. Linearization of mammograms using parameters derived from noise characteristics.
Karssemeijer N; Snoeren PR; Zhang W
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():258-69. PubMed ID: 17354701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gray scale registration of mammograms using a model of image acquisition.
Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():401-12. PubMed ID: 15344475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.
Burgess A
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1987-95. PubMed ID: 15305451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.
Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Khamapirad T; Grady JJ; Leonard MH; Brunder DG
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4905-21. PubMed ID: 17671343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incomplete skin representation in digital mammograms.
Burgess AE; Kang H
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2834-8. PubMed ID: 15543791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical image restoration with different types of noise.
Sánchez MG; Vidal V; Verdú G; Mayo P; Rodenas F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4382-5. PubMed ID: 23366898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
Kus P; Karagoz I
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detecting and classifying linear structures in mammograms using random forests.
Berks M; Chen Z; Astley S; Taylor C
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2011; 22():510-24. PubMed ID: 21761682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography.
Nykänen K; Siltanen S
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1864-73. PubMed ID: 12906205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An adaptive algorithm for the detection of microcalcifications in simulated low-dose mammography.
Treiber O; Wanninger F; Führ H; Panzer W; Regulla D; Winkler G
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 12630741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Carvalho JD; Santiago SA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18232342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
