BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354802)

  • 1. CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms.
    Dempere-Marco L; Oubel E; Castro M; Putman C; Frangi A; Cebral J
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):438-45. PubMed ID: 17354802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hybrid 1D and 3D approach to hemodynamics modelling for a patient-specific cerebral vasculature and aneurysm.
    Ho H; Sands G; Schmid H; Mithraratne K; Mallinson G; Hunter P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):323-30. PubMed ID: 20426128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms--comparison with computed fluid dynamics.
    Naito T; Miyachi S; Matsubara N; Isoda H; Izumi T; Haraguchi K; Takahashi I; Ishii K; Wakabayashi T
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 22392013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-World Variability in the Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Shear Stress: The 2015 International Aneurysm CFD Challenge.
    Valen-Sendstad K; Bergersen AW; Shimogonya Y; Goubergrits L; Bruening J; Pallares J; Cito S; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Geers AJ; Larrabide I; Rapaka S; Mihalef V; Fu W; Qiao A; Jain K; Roller S; Mardal KA; Kamakoti R; Spirka T; Ashton N; Revell A; Aristokleous N; Houston JG; Tsuji M; Ishida F; Menon PG; Browne LD; Broderick S; Shojima M; Koizumi S; Barbour M; Aliseda A; Morales HG; Lefèvre T; Hodis S; Al-Smadi YM; Tran JS; Marsden AL; Vaippummadhom S; Einstein GA; Brown AG; Debus K; Niizuma K; Rashad S; Sugiyama SI; Owais Khan M; Updegrove AR; Shadden SC; Cornelissen BMW; Majoie CBLM; Berg P; Saalfield S; Kono K; Steinman DA
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):544-564. PubMed ID: 30203115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates.
    Karmonik C; Yen C; Grossman RG; Klucznik R; Benndorf G
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 May; 151(5):479-85; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 19343271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of size and elasticity on the relation between flow velocity and wall shear stress in side-wall aneurysms: A lattice Boltzmann-based computer simulation study.
    Wang H; Krüger T; Varnik F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227770. PubMed ID: 31945111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations.
    Hoi Y; Woodward SH; Kim M; Taulbee DB; Meng H
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Dec; 128(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 17154684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity.
    Cebral JR; Castro MA; Appanaboyina S; Putman CM; Millan D; Frangi AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Apr; 24(4):457-67. PubMed ID: 15822804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactive decomposition and mapping of saccular cerebral aneurysms using harmonic functions: its first application with "patient-specific" computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.
    Jiang J; Strother CM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Feb; 32(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 22955892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local hemodynamics at the rupture point of cerebral aneurysms determined by computational fluid dynamics analysis.
    Omodaka S; Sugiyama S; Inoue T; Funamoto K; Fujimura M; Shimizu H; Hayase T; Takahashi A; Tominaga T
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012; 34(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 22965244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual angiography for visualization and validation of computational models of aneurysm hemodynamics.
    Ford MD; Stuhne GR; Nikolov HN; Habets DF; Lownie SP; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1586-92. PubMed ID: 16350918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory tests for strength paramaters of brain aneurysms.
    Tóth BK; Nasztanovics F; Bojtár I
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2007; 9(2):3-7. PubMed ID: 18421937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis and Correlation with Intraoperative Aneurysm Features.
    Feletti A; Wang X; Talari S; Mewada T; Mamadaliev D; Tanaka R; Yamada Y; Kei Y; Suyama D; Kawase T; Kato Y
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2018; 129():3-9. PubMed ID: 30171307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The haemodynamics of endovascular aneurysm treatment: a computational modelling approach for estimating the influence of multiple coil deployment.
    Kakalis NM; Mitsos AP; Byrne JV; Ventikos Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):814-24. PubMed ID: 18541488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinear anisotropic stress analysis of anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysms.
    Ma B; Lu J; Harbaugh RE; Raghavan ML
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 17227102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms.
    Sun Q; Groth A; Aach T
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):742-54. PubMed ID: 22320784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of aneurysm geometry on the intra-aneurysmal flow condition.
    Tateshima S; Chien A; Sayre J; Cebral J; Viñuela F
    Neuroradiology; 2010 Dec; 52(12):1135-41. PubMed ID: 20373097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
    Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of using generic flow conditions to quantify aneurysmal haemodynamics: A comparison against simulations incorporating boundary conditions measured in vivo.
    Li B; Liu T; Liu J; Liu Y; Cao B; Zhao X; Wang W; Shi M; Zhang L; Xu K; Chen M; Wen C; Zhang M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107034. PubMed ID: 35914441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.