These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354826)

  • 1. Analytic expressions for fiducial and surface target registration error.
    Ma B; Ellis RE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):637-44. PubMed ID: 17354826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On fiducial target registration error in the presence of anisotropic noise.
    Ma B; Moghari MH; Ellis RE; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):628-35. PubMed ID: 18044621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rigid-body point-based registration: The distribution of the target registration error when the fiducial registration errors are given.
    Seginer A
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Aug; 15(4):397-413. PubMed ID: 21515088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statistical model for point-based target registration error with anisotropic fiducial localizer error.
    Wiles AD; Likholyot A; Frantz DD; Peters TM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 18334433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved statistical TRE model when using a reference frame.
    Wiles AD; Peters TM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):442-9. PubMed ID: 18051089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A theoretical comparison of different target registration error estimators.
    Moghari MH; Ma B; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):1032-40. PubMed ID: 18982706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A high-order solution for the distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration.
    Moghari MH; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):603-11. PubMed ID: 17354822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. General approach to first-order error prediction in rigid point registration.
    Danilchenko A; Fitzpatrick JM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):679-93. PubMed ID: 21075718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation and reduction of target registration error.
    Datteri RD; Dawant BM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 3):139-46. PubMed ID: 23286124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum-likelihood registration of range images with missing data.
    Sharp GC; Lee SW; Wehe DK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Jan; 30(1):120-30. PubMed ID: 18000329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Registration of a statistical shape model of the lumbar spine to 3D ultrasound images.
    Khallaghi S; Mousavi P; Gong RH; Gill S; Boisvert J; Fichtinger G; Pichora D; Borschneck D; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 2):68-75. PubMed ID: 20879300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the similarity of statistical shape models using the Bhattacharya metric.
    Babalola KO; Cootes TF; Patenaude B; Rao A; Jenkinson M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):142-50. PubMed ID: 17354884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transformation model and constraints cause bias in statistics on deformation fields.
    Rohlfing T
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):207-14. PubMed ID: 17354892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel incremental technique for ultrasound to CT bone surface registration using Unscented Kalman Filtering.
    Moghari MH; Abolmaesumi P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):197-204. PubMed ID: 16685960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A continuous method for reducing interpolation artifacts in mutual information-based rigid image registration.
    Xu L; Wan JW; Bian T
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Aug; 22(8):2995-3007. PubMed ID: 23481853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On averaging multiview relations for 3D scan registration.
    Govindu VM; Pooja A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1289-302. PubMed ID: 23412615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A hamiltonian particle method for diffeomorphic image registration.
    Marsland S; McLachlan R
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2007; 20():396-407. PubMed ID: 17633716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registration accuracy: how good is good enough? A statistical power calculation incorporating image registration uncertainty.
    Gibson E; Fenster A; Ward AD
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):643-50. PubMed ID: 23286103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic construction of active appearance models as an image coding problem.
    Baker S; Matthews I; Schneider J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2004 Oct; 26(10):1380-4. PubMed ID: 15641725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.