BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354828)

  • 1. 2D/3D registration for measurement of implant alignment after total hip replacement.
    Jaramaz B; Eckman K
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):653-61. PubMed ID: 17354828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Submillimeter measurement of cup migration in clinical standard radiographs.
    Burckhardt K; Székely G; Nötzli H; Hodler J; Gerber C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):676-88. PubMed ID: 15889554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer assisted determination of acetabular cup orientation using 2D-3D image registration.
    Zheng G; Zhang X
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Sep; 5(5):437-47. PubMed ID: 20180034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistically deformable 2D/3D registration for accurate determination of post-operative cup orientation from single standard X-ray radiograph.
    Zheng G
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):820-7. PubMed ID: 20426064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Worlicek M; Weber M; Zeman F; Wörner M; Schneider M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 27355814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HipMatch: an object-oriented cross-platform program for accurate determination of cup orientation using 2D-3D registration of single standard X-ray radiograph and a CT volume.
    Zheng G; Zhang X; Steppacher SD; Murphy SB; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Sep; 95(3):236-48. PubMed ID: 19328585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA.
    Zheng G; von Recum J; Nolte LP; Grützner PA; Steppacher SD; Franke J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 21792672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2-D-3-D registration.
    Penney GP; Edwards PJ; Hipwell JH; Slomczykowski M; Revie I; Hawkes DJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1342-8. PubMed ID: 17605366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated 2D-3D registration of portal images and CT data using line-segment enhancement.
    Munbodh R; Chen Z; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Knisely JP; Duncan JS
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4352-61. PubMed ID: 18975681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
    Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching.
    Blendea S; Eckman K; Jaramaz B; Levison TJ; Digioia AM
    Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 16199380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements.
    Davda K; Smyth N; Cobb JP; Hart AJ
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 25674698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2D/3D registration of multiple bones.
    Ma B; Stewart J; Pichora D; Ellis R; Abolmaesumi P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():860-3. PubMed ID: 18002092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
    Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D/2D image registration: the impact of X-ray views and their number.
    Tomazevic D; Likar B; Pernus F
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):450-7. PubMed ID: 18051090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic stereometry for non-metal-backed acetubular cups: 3D wear estimation and related uncertainty.
    Sarry L; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Levai JP; Boire JY
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Jun; 9(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 15854846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of segmentation errors on 3D-to-2D registration of implant models in X-ray images.
    Mahfouz MR; Hoff WA; Komistek RD; Dennis DA
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):229-39. PubMed ID: 15598449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated preoperative planning of femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty from 3D CT data: atlas-based approach and comparative study.
    Otomaru I; Nakamoto M; Kagiyama Y; Takao M; Sugano N; Tomiyama N; Tada Y; Sato Y
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Feb; 16(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 22119490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistically deformable 2D/3D registration for estimating post-operative cup orientation from a single standard AP X-ray radiograph.
    Zheng G
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Sep; 38(9):2910-27. PubMed ID: 20556516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deformable 2D-3D registration of the pelvis with a limited field of view, using shape statistics.
    Sadowsky O; Chintalapani G; Taylor RH
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):519-26. PubMed ID: 18044608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.