159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354855)
21. Application of fractal analysis to mammography.
Raguso G; Ancona A; Chieppa L; L'abbate S; Pepe ML; Mangieri F; De Palo M; Rangayyan RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3182-5. PubMed ID: 21096599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tolerance to missing data using a likelihood ratio based classifier for computer-aided classification of breast cancer.
Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4219-37. PubMed ID: 15509062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast cancer detection and classification in digital mammography based on Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT) and Super Resolution.
Pak F; Kanan HR; Alikhassi A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Nov; 122(2):89-107. PubMed ID: 26206406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated effect-specific mammographic pattern measures.
Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Tanko LB; Nielsen M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Aug; 27(8):1054-60. PubMed ID: 18672423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification.
Salfity MF; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y; Papaioannou J
Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 12772990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.
Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical image restoration with different types of noise.
Sánchez MG; Vidal V; Verdú G; Mayo P; Rodenas F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4382-5. PubMed ID: 23366898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on the shortest path with endpoints learnt by SVMs.
Domingues I; Cardoso JS; Amaral I; Moreira I; Passarinho P; Santa Comba J; Correia R; Cardoso MJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3158-61. PubMed ID: 21096595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spiculation-preserving polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Daloia de Carvalho J; Anchieta Santiago S
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2791-4. PubMed ID: 17945740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An evaluation and comparison of the performance of state of the art approaches for the detection of spiculated masses in mammograms.
Kage A; Elter M; Wittenberg T
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3773-6. PubMed ID: 18002819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.
Elter M; Horsch A
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2052-68. PubMed ID: 19610294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Wavelet-packet-based approach for breast cancer classification.
Torabi M; Razavian SM; Vaziri R; Vosoughi-Vahdat B
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5100-3. PubMed ID: 22255486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
