These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

890 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354869)

  • 1. Open-curve shape correspondence without endpoint correspondence.
    Richardson T; Wang S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):17-24. PubMed ID: 17354869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating shape correspondence for statistical shape analysis: a benchmark study.
    Munsell BC; Dalal P; Wang S
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Nov; 30(11):2023-39. PubMed ID: 18787249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review.
    Heimann T; Meinzer HP
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Aug; 13(4):543-63. PubMed ID: 19525140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building.
    Styner MA; Rajamani KT; Nolte LP; Zsemlye G; Székely G; Taylor CJ; Davies RH
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():63-75. PubMed ID: 15344447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonrigid shape correspondence using landmark sliding, insertion and deletion.
    Richardson T; Wang S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):435-42. PubMed ID: 16685989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shape registration by optimally coding shapes.
    Jiang Y; Xie J; Tsui HT
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Sep; 12(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 18779077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new benchmark for shape correspondence evaluation.
    Munsell BC; Dalal P; Wang S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):507-14. PubMed ID: 18051097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Building 3-D statistical shape models by direct optimization.
    Davies RH; Twining CJ; Cootes TF; Taylor CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Apr; 29(4):961-81. PubMed ID: 19887309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior shape models.
    Albrecht T; Lüthi M; Gerig T; Vetter T
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):959-73. PubMed ID: 23837968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shape modeling using automatic landmarking.
    Xie J; Heng PA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):709-16. PubMed ID: 16686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel approach for curve evolution in segmentation of medical images.
    Farzinfar M; Xue Z; Teoh EK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jul; 34(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 20083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing point correspondence of 3D faces via sparse facial deformable model.
    Pan G; Zhang X; Wang Y; Hu Z; Zheng X; Wu Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Nov; 22(11):4170-81. PubMed ID: 23807441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal feature point selection and automatic initialization in active shape model search.
    Lekadir K; Yang GZ
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 18979776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the confidence of statistical model based shape prediction.
    Blanc R; Syrkina E; Székely G
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():602-13. PubMed ID: 19694297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical shape modeling using MDL incorporating shape, appearance, and expert knowledge.
    Ward AD; Hamarneh G
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):278-85. PubMed ID: 18051069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the similarity of statistical shape models using the Bhattacharya metric.
    Babalola KO; Cootes TF; Patenaude B; Rao A; Jenkinson M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):142-50. PubMed ID: 17354884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shape registration by simultaneously optimizing representation and transformation.
    Jiang Y; Xie J; Sun D; Tsui H
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):809-17. PubMed ID: 18044643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of unwrapped phase in MR image segmentation: a preliminary study.
    Bourgeat P; Fripp J; Janke A; Galloway G; Crozier S; Ourselin S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):813-20. PubMed ID: 16686035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal shape abstraction from examples.
    Fatih Demirci M; Shokoufandeh A; Dickinson SJ
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 May; 31(5):944-52. PubMed ID: 19299866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Particle-based shape analysis of multi-object complexes.
    Cates J; Fletcher PT; Styner M; Hazlett HC; Whitaker R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 1):477-85. PubMed ID: 18979781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.