217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354871)
21. Force measurement of insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays in vitro: comparison of surgeon to automated insertion tool.
Majdani O; Schurzig D; Hussong A; Rau T; Wittkopf J; Lenarz T; Labadie RF
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 19484593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. First use of flat-panel computed tomography during cochlear implant surgery : Perspectives for the use of advanced therapies in cochlear implantation.
Rotter N; Schmitz B; Sommer F; Röhrer S; Schuler PJ; Bischof F; Scheithauer MO; Hoffmann TK
HNO; 2017 Jan; 65(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 27534759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A manually operated, advance off-stylet insertion tool for minimally invasive cochlear implantation surgery.
Kratchman LB; Schurzig D; McRackan TR; Balachandran R; Noble JH; Webster RJ; Labadie RF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2792-800. PubMed ID: 22851233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique.
Roland JT
Laryngoscope; 2005 Aug; 115(8):1325-39. PubMed ID: 16094101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Force application during cochlear implant insertion: an analysis for improvement of surgeon technique.
Todd CA; Naghdy F; Svehla MJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1247-55. PubMed ID: 17605356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Effect of electrode array type and insertion technique on the insertion force: in vitro cochlear model study].
Pan JX; Jia H; Tan HY; Zhou X; Wu H
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):691-697. PubMed ID: 34344094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative Analysis of Robotics-Assisted and Manual Insertions of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.
Claussen AD; Shibata SB; Kaufmann CR; Henslee A; Hansen MR
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 36201552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Manual Electrode Array Insertion Through a Robot-Assisted Minimal Invasive Cochleostomy: Feasibility and Comparison of Two Different Electrode Array Subtypes.
Venail F; Bell B; Akkari M; Wimmer W; Williamson T; Gerber N; Gavaghan K; Canovas F; Weber S; Caversaccio M; Uziel A
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):1015-22. PubMed ID: 25853609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation.
Tamames I; King C; Bas E; Dietrich WD; Telischi F; Rajguru SM
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():32-9. PubMed ID: 27260269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants with integrated force sensing capability.
Kobler JP; Beckmann D; Rau TS; Majdani O; Ortmaier T
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 May; 9(3):481-94. PubMed ID: 23959671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determination of the curling behavior of a preformed cochlear implant electrode array.
Rau TS; Majdani O; Hussong A; Lenarz T; Leinung M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 May; 6(3):421-33. PubMed ID: 20665247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fabrication and evaluation of an improved polymer-based cochlear electrode array for atraumatic insertion.
Gwon TM; Min KS; Kim JH; Oh SH; Lee HS; Park MH; Kim SJ
Biomed Microdevices; 2015 Apr; 17(2):32. PubMed ID: 25681972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrode design and insertional depth-dependent intra-cochlear pressure changes: a model experiment.
Mittmann P; Ernst A; Todt I
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Mar; 132(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 29103379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cadaveric feasibility study of da Vinci Si-assisted cochlear implant with augmented visual navigation for otologic surgery.
Liu WP; Azizian M; Sorger J; Taylor RH; Reilly BK; Cleary K; Preciado D
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Mar; 140(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24457635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The misplaced cochlear implant electrode array.
Mehanna AM; Gamaleldin OA; Fathalla MF
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Feb; 117():96-104. PubMed ID: 30579097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [A new method for REZ-1 cochlear implant electrode array insertion].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 44(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 19954027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
