These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17354898)

  • 1. Feasibility of patient specific aortic blood flow CFD simulation.
    Svensson J; Gårdhagen R; Heiberg E; Ebbers T; Loyd D; Länne T; Karlsson M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):257-63. PubMed ID: 17354898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
    Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom.
    Zhao SZ; Papathanasopoulou P; Long Q; Marshall I; Xu XY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 31(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12918911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta.
    Goubergrits L; Riesenkampff E; Yevtushenko P; Schaller J; Kertzscher U; Hennemuth A; Berger F; Schubert S; Kuehne T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 24723299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements.
    Rayz VL; Boussel L; Acevedo-Bolton G; Martin AJ; Young WL; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Saloner D
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051011. PubMed ID: 19045518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic 4D blood flow mapping.
    Friman O; Hennemuth A; Harloff A; Bock J; Markl M; Peitgen HO
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):416-23. PubMed ID: 20879427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of inflow boundary conditions on intra left ventricle flow predictions.
    Long Q; Merrifield R; Yang GZ; Kilner PJ; Firmin DN; Xu XY
    J Biomech Eng; 2003 Dec; 125(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 14986421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A fast alternative to computational fluid dynamics for high quality imaging of blood flow.
    McGregor RH; Szczerbal D; Muralidhar K; Székely G
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):124-31. PubMed ID: 20425979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
    Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 4D model of hemodynamics in the abdominal aorta.
    Zbicinski I; Veshkina N; Stefańczyk L
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S257-64. PubMed ID: 26406010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Progress towards patient-specific computational flow modeling of the left heart via combination of magnetic resonance imaging with computational fluid dynamics.
    Saber NR; Wood NB; Gosman AD; Merrifield RD; Yang GZ; Charrier CL; Gatehouse PD; Firmin DN
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 12572655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subject-specific computational simulation of left ventricular flow based on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Long Q; Merrifield R; Xu XY; Kilner P; Firmin DN; G-Z Y
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 May; 222(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 18595359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of systolic and diastolic arterial wall shear stress in the ascending aorta.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Patatoukas G; Pantos I; Benekos O; Katritsis D; Kelekis NL
    Phys Med; 2008 Dec; 24(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 18343178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the coupling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity measurements with computational fluid dynamics in a U bend.
    Glor FP; Westenberg JJ; Vierendeels J; Danilouchkine M; Verdonck P
    Artif Organs; 2002 Jul; 26(7):622-35. PubMed ID: 12081521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flow-induced disturbances in balanced steady-state free precession images: means to reduce or exploit them.
    Lagerstrand KM; Plewes DB; Vikhoff-Baaz B; Forssell-Aronsson E
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 Apr; 61(4):893-8. PubMed ID: 19191282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.
    Kidher E; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25488105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Fluid studies on flow behaviour in narrowing vessels with PC-velocimetry and numerical simulations].
    Lehmpfuhl M; Hao C; Martirosian P; Schick F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Feb; 54(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 19182872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRI-based CFD analysis of flow in a human left ventricle: methodology and application to a healthy heart.
    Schenkel T; Malve M; Reik M; Markl M; Jung B; Oertel H
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 37(3):503-15. PubMed ID: 19130229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis.
    Boccadifuoco A; Mariotti A; Capellini K; Celi S; Salvetti MV
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
    Annio G; Torii R; Ducci A; Muthurangu V; Tsang V; Burriesci G
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3481-3493. PubMed ID: 34181130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.