These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17355038)

  • 1. Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model.
    Ulrich R; Nitschke J; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1140-52. PubMed ID: 17355038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal reproduction within and across senses: Testing the supramodal property of the pacemaker-counter model.
    Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1218-1235. PubMed ID: 31219286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Nov; 60(8):1305-17. PubMed ID: 9865072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multisensory identification of natural objects in a two-way crossmodal priming paradigm.
    Schneider TR; Engel AK; Debener S
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 18444522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities.
    Jaśkowski P; Jaroszyk F; Hojan-Jezierska D
    Psychol Res; 1990; 52(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 2377723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the influence of the 'unity assumption' on the temporal perception of realistic audiovisual stimuli.
    Vatakis A; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 17258164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossmodal duration perception involves perceptual grouping, temporal ventriloquism, and variable internal clock rates.
    Klink PC; Montijn JS; van Wezel RJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):219-36. PubMed ID: 21258921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.
    Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 18372750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.
    Meck WH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():528-41. PubMed ID: 6588813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal judgments in multi-sensory space.
    Retsa C; Naish P; Bekinschtein T; Bak TH
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():101-112. PubMed ID: 26898372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.
    Guttman SE; Gilroy LA; Blake R
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 15733204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review.
    Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):971-95. PubMed ID: 21264748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible and abstract resolutions to crossmodal conflicts.
    Donovan CL; Lindsay DS; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15380869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.
    Rammsayer T; Pichelmann S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2364-2377. PubMed ID: 30362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual learning in auditory temporal discrimination: no evidence for a cross-modal transfer to the visual modality.
    Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):382-9. PubMed ID: 19293111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Tourret S; Wearden J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):797-818. PubMed ID: 15204118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.