These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17355043)
21. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing. Kim JI; Humphreys GW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can one pay attention to a particular color? Brawn P; Snowden RJ Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jul; 61(5):860-73. PubMed ID: 10499000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. More than just finding color: strategy in global visual search is shaped by learned target probabilities. Williams CC; Pollatsek A; Cave KR; Stroud MJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 19485685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search. Becker SI; Horstmann G Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues. Gottlob LR Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target. Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments. Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors. Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Lleras A; Von Mühlenen A Spat Vis; 2004; 17(4-5):465-82. PubMed ID: 15559114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Allocation of attention in texture segregation, visual search, and location-precuing paradigms. Cheal M; Lyon DR Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 Feb; 47(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 8177962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations? Mordkoff JT; Halterman R; Chen P Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):819-24. PubMed ID: 18792510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A configural dominant account of contextual cueing: Configural cues are stronger than colour cues. Kunar MA; John R; Sweetman H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1366-82. PubMed ID: 24199842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search. Beesley T; Vadillo MA; Pearson D; Shanks DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 24999706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations. Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 29116615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Precuing benefits for color and location in a visual search task. Vierck E; Miller J Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 18372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contextual cuing: the effects of stimulus variation, intentionality, and aging. Lyon J; Scialfa C; Cordazzo S; Bubric K Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 24821293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. Brady TF; Chun MM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):798-815. PubMed ID: 17683229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]