258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17355358)
1. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up.
Morgan DJ; Hunter DC; McCracken G; McClelland HR; Price JH; Dobbs SP
BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):537-42. PubMed ID: 17355358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopically-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with five years follow-up: a case control study.
Yu JJ; Yang WX; Wang XM
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 23781588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.
Roy M; Plante M; Renaud MC; Têtu B
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 8812529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Kucukmetin A; Biliatis I; Naik R; Bryant A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD006651. PubMed ID: 24085528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): A comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy.
Sharma R; Bailey J; Anderson R; Murdoch J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(5):1927-32. PubMed ID: 17009993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma: morbidity and long-term follow-up.
Mehra G; Weekes A; Vantrappen P; Visvanathan D; Jeyarajah A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Mar; 36(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 19800194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome.
Lanowska M; Brink-Spalink V; Mangler M; Grittner U; von Tucher E; Schneider A; Köhler C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 24362556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22617585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The place of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in surgical treatment of cervical cancer].
Gorchev G; Tomov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15853003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic assisted parametrectomy/upper vaginectomy (LPUV)-technique, applications and results.
Fleisch MC; Hatch KD
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Sep; 98(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 16005499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
