137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17356174)
1. Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography.
Vaño E; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Prieto C; González L; Rodríguez R; de las Heras H
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):461-6. PubMed ID: 17356174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
Andriole KP
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; Davies JG
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):707-12. PubMed ID: 11110932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.
Ciraj O; Marković S; Kosutić D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 15755772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Korea.
Kim YH; Choi JH; Kim CK; Kim JM; Kim SS; Oh YW; Lee CY; Kang DH; Lee YB; Cho PK; Kim HC; Kim CM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 17223642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A study of entrance surface dose with CR and film/screen systems, and analysis of the X-ray conditions for chest radiography].
Mori T; Muto H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 60(14):863-7. PubMed ID: 11197837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
Matsumoto M
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Software for the estimation of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures.
Osei EK; Barnett R
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 19690363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of radiation dose in examination of the abdomen using different radiological imaging techniques.
Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
Br J Radiol; 1994 May; 67(797):478-84. PubMed ID: 8193895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
