These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17356174)

  • 1. Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography.
    Vaño E; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Prieto C; González L; Rodríguez R; de las Heras H
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):461-6. PubMed ID: 17356174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; Davies JG
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):707-12. PubMed ID: 11110932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
    Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.
    Ciraj O; Marković S; Kosutić D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 15755772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Korea.
    Kim YH; Choi JH; Kim CK; Kim JM; Kim SS; Oh YW; Lee CY; Kang DH; Lee YB; Cho PK; Kim HC; Kim CM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 17223642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A study of entrance surface dose with CR and film/screen systems, and analysis of the X-ray conditions for chest radiography].
    Mori T; Muto H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 60(14):863-7. PubMed ID: 11197837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
    Matsumoto M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Software for the estimation of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Osei EK; Barnett R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 19690363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of radiation dose in examination of the abdomen using different radiological imaging techniques.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 May; 67(797):478-84. PubMed ID: 8193895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.