137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17356174)
21. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects.
Muhogora WE; Ahmed NA; Almosabihi A; Alsuwaidi JS; Beganovic A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Kabuya FK; Krisanachinda A; Milakovic M; Mukwada G; Ramanandraibe MJ; Rehani MM; Rouzitalab J; Shandorf C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 18492891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Paediatric dose measurement in a full-body digital radiography unit.
Maree GJ; Irving BJ; Hering ER
Pediatr Radiol; 2007 Oct; 37(10):990-7. PubMed ID: 17786423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical exposure of the population from diagnostic use of ionizing radiation in luxembourg between 1994 and 2002.
Shannoun F; Zeeb H; Back C; Blettner M
Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 16832196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
Hawking N; Elmore A
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An estimation of the annual effective dose to the Canadian population from medical CT examinations.
Chen J; Moir D
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 20530855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT.
Huda W; Vance A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):540-6. PubMed ID: 17242266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment.
Andriole KP; Luth DM; Gould RG
J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():124-6. PubMed ID: 12105711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology.
Parry RA; Glaze SA; Archer BR
Radiographics; 1999; 19(5):1289-302. PubMed ID: 10489180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
Schuncke A; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
