These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17356174)

  • 61. Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels in paediatric screen-film radiography at a children's hospital.
    Wambani JS; Korir GK; Korir IK; Kilaha S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 May; 154(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 23091220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison of computerized digital and film-screen radiography: response to variation in imaging kVp.
    Broderick NJ; Long B; Dreesen RG; Cohen MD; Cory DA; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA
    Pediatr Radiol; 1992; 22(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 1408442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A computer-assisted procedure for estimating patient exposure and fetal dose in radiographic examinations.
    Glaze S; Schneiders N; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):187-90. PubMed ID: 6896923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. An investigation of X-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography.
    Williams JR; Catling MK
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1192-8. PubMed ID: 10434915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Validation of a large-scale audit technique for CT dose optimisation.
    Wood TJ; Davis AW; Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 22090412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Analysis of patient doses for myelogram and discogram examinations and their reduction through changes in equipment set-up.
    Martin CJ; Hunter S
    Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):508-14. PubMed ID: 7788237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Conventional vs computed radiography: evaluation of myelography.
    Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Carmody RF; Seeger JF; Yoshino MT; Mockbee B
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(1):165-8. PubMed ID: 3124568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Variation of Pediatric Doses Undergoing Digital and Computed Radiography Examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Teferi S; Zewdeneh D
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Mar; 30(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 32165817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Use of computed radiography in respiratory distress syndrome in the neonatal nursery.
    Nakano Y; Odagiri K
    Pediatr Radiol; 1989; 19(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 2717250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Radiation Exposure in the NICU: Computed Radiography versus Digital Detector Radiography.
    Oberle R
    Radiol Manage; 2015; 37(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26710555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Dose audit for patients undergoing two common radiography examinations with digital radiology systems.
    İnal T; Ataç G
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 24317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Establishing local and regional DRLs by means of electronic radiographical X-ray examination records.
    Charnock P; Moores BM; Wilde R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Nov; 157(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 23651655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Implementation of a programme for reduction of radiographic doses and results achieved through increases in tube potential.
    Martin CJ; Darragh CL; McKenzie GA; Bayliss AP
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Mar; 66(783):228-33. PubMed ID: 8472116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Assessment of patient doses in CR examinations throughout a large health region.
    Thakur Y; Bjarnason TA; Hammerstrom K; Marchinkow L; Koch T; Aldrich JE
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 21547516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction?].
    Pötter-Lang S; Dünkelmeyer M; Uffmann M
    Radiologe; 2012 Oct; 52(10):898-904. PubMed ID: 22986575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre.
    Ball S; McKerrow M; Murphy A
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 70(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36319191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Film density calibration for computed radiography systems: is the standard three-point procedure accurate?
    Huda W; Jing Z; Hoyle BA
    Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):875-7. PubMed ID: 8351366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Slot-scan digital radiography of the lower extremities: a comparison to computed radiography with respect to image quality and radiation dose.
    Lee KH; Kwon JW; Yoon YC; Choi SH; Jung JY; Kim JH; Lee SJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 19182503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography: part II. Economic analysis.
    Reiner BI; Salkever D; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Siddiqui KM; Musk A
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):420-6. PubMed ID: 15972336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Patient dose optimization in plain radiography based on standard exposure factors.
    George J; Eatough JP; Mountford PJ; Koller CJ; Oxtoby J; Frain G
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 77(922):858-63. PubMed ID: 15482998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.