These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17356174)

  • 81. [Radiation burden of patients in conventional diagnostic radiology: analysis of radiologic practice in Serbia].
    Ciraj-Bjelac OF; Kovacević MS; Kosutić DD; Stanković SS
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 2007; 54(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 17988039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Computed radiography printing problems: a quantitative, observer-independent solution.
    Hildestad CA; Morin RL
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):43-4. PubMed ID: 10847360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. [Investigation of patient exposure doses in diagnostic radiography in 2011 questionnaire].
    Asada Y; Suzuki S; Kobayashi K; Kato H; Igarashi T; Tsukamoto A; Sakamoto H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Apr; 69(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 23609858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Hallway Conversations in Physics
    Huo D; Rill L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):W56-W57. PubMed ID: 27929659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. [A method for determination of the effective dose received by patient during digital scanning fluorographic examination from the results of measurement of radiation dose scattered by patient's body].
    Blinov NN; Gurzhiev AN; Gurzhiev SN; Kirichenko MG; Kostritskiĭ AV
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 16285236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Optimising default radiographic exposure factors using Deviation Index.
    Creeden A; Curtis M
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 32199801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. SURVEY OF IMAGING TECHNOLOGY AND PATIENT DOSE RECORDING PRACTICE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
    Rehani MM; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(3):240-245. PubMed ID: 29438539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Use of radiography in small animal practice in the UK and Republic of Ireland in 2013.
    Booth NJ; Morley SJ; Ewers RS
    Vet Rec; 2018 Feb; 182(8):225. PubMed ID: 29386251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Retrospective evaluation of exposure index (EI) values from plain radiographs reveals important considerations for quality improvement.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Robinson J; Lewis SJ; Moran B
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2013 Dec; 60(4):115-22. PubMed ID: 26229619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study.
    Nyathi T; Chirwa T; van der Merwe D
    Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2010; 6(1):e5. PubMed ID: 21611065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. [New possibilities of reduction of irradiation doses in radiography with the aid of intensifying screens].
    Gurvich AM; Katomina RV; Miagkova MG; Rassokhin BM; Rozenshtraikh LS
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1975; (5):64-9. PubMed ID: 1209908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Lewis SJ; Moran B; Robinson J
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 61(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 26229645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. [To the ways of the most reasonable implementation of digital radiography into the practical public health of the Russian Federation].
    Portnoĭ LM; Stepanova EA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2004; (5):4-19. PubMed ID: 15704439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Patient exposure and risk assessment.
    Moores BM
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 81(966):517-8. PubMed ID: 18487392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Transition to computed radiography: can emergency medicine doctors accurately predict the need of film printing to facilitate optimal patient care?
    Yang SM; Lo CM
    World J Emerg Med; 2011; 2(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25214980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Radiation doses in diagnostic x-ray procedures.
    LINCOLN TA; GUPTON ED
    Radiology; 1958 Aug; 71(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 13568064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Masters' film interpretation session.
    Radiographics; 1987 May; 7(3):465-503. PubMed ID: 3448644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Reproduction of roentgenograms on 35 mm. Direct positive film for projection.
    LAWSON RC
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1960 Feb; 83():354-6. PubMed ID: 14414759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Comparative radiation doses in dental radiography.
    Lee W
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1975 Jan; 4(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 25629850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. New online-only MDA radiography training program debuts this month.
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2014 Jun; 96(6):7. PubMed ID: 25007452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.