509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17356371)
1. A histomorphogenic analysis of bone grafts augmented with adult stem cells.
Smiler D; Soltan M; Lee JW
Implant Dent; 2007 Mar; 16(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17356371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxilla sinus grafting with marine algae derived bone forming material: a clinical report of long-term results.
Ewers R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1712-23. PubMed ID: 16297691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deproteinized bovine bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation surgery: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study.
Simunek A; Kopecka D; Somanathan RV; Pilathadka S; Brazda T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):935-42. PubMed ID: 19014165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The amount of newly formed bone in sinus grafting procedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type and residual amount of the grafted material.
Artzi Z; Kozlovsky A; Nemcovsky CE; Weinreb M
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 15691351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bone grafting materials in human extraction sockets: clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations.
Thompson DM; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16569967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sinus floor augmentation with recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5): a pilot study in the Goettingen miniature pig comparing autogenous bone and rhGDF-5.
Gruber RM; Ludwig A; Merten HA; Pippig S; Kramer FJ; Schliephake H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 19077151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus grafting with a biphasic calcium phosphate: histologic and histomorphometric observations.
Friedmann A; Dard M; Kleber BM; Bernimoulin JP; Bosshardt DD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 19453566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic and clinical evaluation for maxillary sinus augmentation using macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate in human.
Lee JH; Jung UW; Kim CS; Choi SH; Cho KS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):767-71. PubMed ID: 18705808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone block allograft impregnated with bone marrow aspirate.
Soltan M; Smiler D; Prasad HS; Rohrer MD
Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):329-39. PubMed ID: 18091160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calvarial versus iliac crest for autologous bone graft material for a sinus lift procedure: a histomorphometric study.
Crespi R; Vinci R; Capparè P; Gherlone E; Romanos GE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 17929512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary sinus floor grafting with beta-tricalcium phosphate in humans: density and microarchitecture of the newly formed bone.
Suba Z; Takács D; Matusovits D; Barabás J; Fazekas A; Szabó G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 16441791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histomorphometric assessment of bone formation in sinus augmentation utilizing a combination of autogenous and hydroxyapatite/biphasic tricalcium phosphate graft materials: at 6 and 9 months in humans.
Artzi Z; Weinreb M; Carmeli G; Lev-Dor R; Dard M; Nemcovsky CE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):686-92. PubMed ID: 18492077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a synthetic cell-binding peptide: histological and histomorphometrical results in humans.
Degidi M; Piattelli M; Scarano A; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(6):376-83. PubMed ID: 15641457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histomorphometric analysis of human maxillary sinus lift with a new bone substitute biocomposite: a preliminary report.
Dellavia C; Tartaglia G; Sforza C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Oct; 11 Suppl 1():e59-68. PubMed ID: 19744196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting.
Froum SJ; Wallace SS; Elian N; Cho SC; Tarnow DP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 17243327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Massive sinus-lift procedures with beta-tricalcium phosphate: long-term results].
Meyer C; Chatelain B; Benarroch M; Garnier JF; Ricbourg B; Camponovo T
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 19171358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone augmentation of the inferior floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone or composite bone grafts: a histologic-histomorphometric preliminary report.
Lorenzetti M; Mozzati M; Campanino PP; Valente G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 9509782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the healing process in sinus bone grafting using various grafting materials.
Kim YK; Yun PY; Kim SG; Lim SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 18801669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
