508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17356371)
21. The effects of resorbable membrane on human maxillary sinus graft: a pilot study.
Choi KS; Kan JY; Boyne PJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL; Rungcharassaeng K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19344028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Use of cell-based approaches in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.
Park JB
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):557-60. PubMed ID: 20216438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants. Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla.
Smiler DG; Johnson PW; Lozada JL; Misch C; Rosenlicht JL; Tatum OH; Wagner JR
Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):151-86; discussion 187-8. PubMed ID: 1737600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone grafts.
Zijderveld SA; Zerbo IR; van den Bergh JP; Schulten EA; ten Bruggenkate CM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 15973955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone grafting by means of a tunnel dissection: predictable results using stem cells and matrix.
Soltan M; Smiler D; Soltan C; Prasad HS; Rohrer MD
Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 20683284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a tissue-engineered bone complex with OsteoBone and bMSCs in rabbits.
Sun XJ; Zhang ZY; Wang SY; Gittens SA; Jiang XQ; Chou LL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):804-13. PubMed ID: 18705812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial of autogenous bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevation: histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.
Szabó G; Huys L; Coulthard P; Maiorana C; Garagiola U; Barabás J; Németh Z; Hrabák K; Suba Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 15973948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bone marrow aspiration: technique, grafts, and reports.
Smiler D; Soltan M
Implant Dent; 2006 Sep; 15(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 16966895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The efficacy of demineralized bone matrix and cancellous bone chips for maxillary sinus augmentation.
Kim DM; Nevins ML; Camelo M; Camelo JM; Schupbach P; Hanratty JJ; Uzel NG; Nevins M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Aug; 29(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 19639062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histologic and histomorphometric analysis.
Barone A; Crespi R; Aldini NN; Fini M; Giardino R; Covani U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 16161735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of cellular response to anorganic bone matrix/cell binding peptide and allogenic cranial bone after sinus augmentation in rhesus monkeys.
El-Madany I; Emam H; Sharawy M
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Apr; 37(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 20545546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical evaluation of association of bovine organic osseous matrix and bovine bone morphogenetic protein versus autogenous bone graft in sinus floor augmentation.
Serra E Silva FM; Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa J; Mazzonetto R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 64(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 16713808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are culture-expanded autogenous bone cells a clinically reliable option for sinus grafting?
Fuerst G; Strbac GD; Vasak C; Tangl S; Leber J; Gahleitner A; Gruber R; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19077153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sinus augmentation using human mesenchymal stem cells loaded into a beta-tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite scaffold.
Shayesteh YS; Khojasteh A; Soleimani M; Alikhasi M; Khoshzaban A; Ahmadbeigi N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 18424115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Immediate loading of the grafted maxillary sinus using platelet rich plasma and autogenous bone: a preliminary study with histologic and histomorphometric analysis.
Lee CY; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS
Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 18332759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Purely cancellous vs. corticocancellous bone in sinus floor augmentation with autogenous iliac crest: a prospective clinical trial.
Gerressen M; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Riediger D; Hilgers RD; Spiekermann H; Ghassemi A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 19077155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Histologic evaluation of a sinus elevation procedure: a clinical report.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ; Tarnow DP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Feb; 16(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 8631610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The sinus lift with phycogenic bone substitute. A histomorphometric study.
Simunek A; Cierny M; Kopecka D; Kohout A; Bukac J; Vahalova D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Jun; 16(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 15877755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lack of beneficial effects of platelet-rich plasma on sinus augmentation using a fluorohydroxyapatite or autogenous bone: an explorative study.
Klongnoi B; Rupprecht S; Kessler P; Zimmermann R; Thorwarth M; Pongsiri S; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J; Schlegel KA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 33(7):500-9. PubMed ID: 16820038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man.
Scarano A; Degidi M; Iezzi G; Pecora G; Piattelli M; Orsini G; Caputi S; Perrotti V; Mangano C; Piattelli A
Implant Dent; 2006 Jun; 15(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 16766904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]