These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17357068)

  • 21. Using Linkage Analysis to Detect Gene-Gene Interactions. 2. Improved Reliability and Extension to More-Complex Models.
    Hodge SE; Hager VR; Greenberg DA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146240. PubMed ID: 26752287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A simulation study investigating power estimates in phenome-wide association studies.
    Verma A; Bradford Y; Dudek S; Lucas AM; Verma SS; Pendergrass SA; Ritchie MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29618318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Publication selection in health policy research: the winner's curse hypothesis.
    Costa-Font J; McGuire A; Stanley T
    Health Policy; 2013 Jan; 109(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23182564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Empirical Bayes correction for the Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.
    Ferguson JP; Cho JH; Yang C; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 37(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 23012258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reduction of selection bias in genomewide studies by resampling.
    Sun L; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 May; 28(4):352-67. PubMed ID: 15761913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A simple yet accurate correction for winner's curse can predict signals discovered in much larger genome scans.
    Bigdeli TB; Lee D; Webb BT; Riley BP; Vladimirov VI; Fanous AH; Kendler KS; Bacanu SA
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2598-603. PubMed ID: 27187203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A latent variable model approach to estimating systematic bias in the oversampling method.
    Hauner KK; Zinbarg RE; Revelle W
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):786-97. PubMed ID: 24142836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Replication of linkage studies of complex traits: an examination of variation in location estimates.
    Roberts SB; MacLean CJ; Neale MC; Eaves LJ; Kendler KS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Sep; 65(3):876-84. PubMed ID: 10441592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.
    Anderson SF; Maxwell SE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 28266872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating genetic heterogeneity in complex disorders.
    Pal DK; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12435885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimating penetrance from family data using a retrospective likelihood when ascertainment depends on genotype and age of onset.
    Carayol J; Bonaïti-Pellié C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15305327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GWAS to Sequencing: Divergence in Study Design and Analysis.
    King CR; Nicolae DL
    Genes (Basel); 2014 May; 5(2):460-76. PubMed ID: 24879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peril beyond the winner's curse: A small sample size is the bane of biomarker discovery.
    Thambisetty M; Casanova R; Varma S; Legido Quigley C
    Alzheimers Dement; 2017 May; 13(5):606-607. PubMed ID: 28119051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A nonparametric method for penetrance function estimation.
    Alarcon F; Bonaïti-Pellié C; Harari-Kermadec H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18618769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of statistical power between 2 * 2 allele frequency and allele positivity tables in case-control studies of complex disease genes.
    Ohashi J; Yamamoto S; Tsuchiya N; Hatta Y; Komata T; Matsushita M; Tokunaga K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Mar; 65(Pt 2):197-206. PubMed ID: 11434330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Power for genetic association studies with random allele frequencies and genotype distributions.
    Ambrosius WT; Lange EM; Langefeld CD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Apr; 74(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 15024689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linkage analysis assuming a single-locus mode of inheritance for traits determined by two loci: inferring mode of inheritance and estimating penetrance.
    Greenberg DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(6):467-79. PubMed ID: 2292371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Likelihood formulation of parent-of-origin effects on segregation analysis, including ascertainment.
    Haghighi F; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Jan; 70(1):142-56. PubMed ID: 11741195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.