These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17357823)

  • 1. Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery.
    Silva E; Ferreira U; Silva GD; Mariano MB; Netto NR; Billis A; Magna LA
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2007; 39(3):865-9. PubMed ID: 17357823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation in the early phase of the learning curve comparing to retropubic approach.
    Martorana G; Manferrari F; Bertaccini A; Malizia M; Palmieri F; Severini E; Vitullo G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2004 Mar; 76(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15185814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
    Dahl DM; He W; Lazarus R; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1253-6. PubMed ID: 17141845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
    Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
    Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 12463122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
    Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.
    Akita H; Okamura T; Ando R; Nagata D; Naruyama H; Yamada Y; Naiki T; Yasui T; Tozawa K; Kohri K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):2959-61. PubMed ID: 22393971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy.
    Artibani W; Grosso G; Novara G; Pecoraro G; Sidoti O; Sarti A; Ficarra V
    Eur Urol; 2003 Oct; 44(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 14499672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy at Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand: a retrospective review.
    Kongcharoensombat W; Tantirangsee N; Chaimuangraj S; Leelanuphun C; Kochakarn W; Patcharatrakul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95(8):1035-40. PubMed ID: 23061307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.
    Magheli A; Gonzalgo ML; Su LM; Guzzo TJ; Netto G; Humphreys EB; Han M; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(12):1956-62. PubMed ID: 21044243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients.
    Busch J; Gonzalgo ML; Leva N; Ferrari M; Cash H; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Miller K; Magheli A
    World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 24853030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.