281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17357992)
1. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regression modelling of diagnostic likelihood ratios for the evaluation of medical diagnostic tests.
Leisenring W; Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):444-52. PubMed ID: 9629638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios.
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of one-sample two-sided sequential t-tests for application in epidemiological studies.
van der Tweel I; Kaaks R; van Noord PA
Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2781-95. PubMed ID: 8981686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC; Loring DW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
Qin J; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.
Gengsheng Qin ; Davis AE; Jing BY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 19654172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage.
Hayen A; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bossuyt P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):883-91. PubMed ID: 20079607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds using survival methods.
Putter H; Fiocco M; Stijnen T
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):95-110. PubMed ID: 19924701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compbdt: an R program to compare two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design.
Roldán-Nofuentes JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):143. PubMed ID: 32503431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian estimation for performance measures of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
Aragon DC; Martinez EZ; Achcar JA
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):821-34. PubMed ID: 20496208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
Bloch DA
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.
Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
