167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17357994)
1. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size calculations for controlling the distribution of false discovery proportion in microarray experiments.
Oura T; Matsui S; Kawakami K
Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):694-705. PubMed ID: 19628638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A two-step multiple comparison procedure for a large number of tests and multiple treatments.
Jiang H; Doerge RW
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article28. PubMed ID: 17402912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data.
Zhang S
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A statistical method for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes.
Lai Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Jun; 30(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 16650806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
Qiu J; Cui X
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clustering of regression models method with applications in gene expression data.
Qin LX; Self SG
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):526-33. PubMed ID: 16918917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
Qian HR; Huang S
Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. D-Serine exposure resulted in gene expression changes implicated in neurodegenerative disorders and neuronal dysfunction in male Fischer 344 rats.
Davidson ME; Kerepesi LA; Soto A; Chan VT
Arch Toxicol; 2009 Aug; 83(8):747-62. PubMed ID: 19212759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Empirical bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays.
Efron B; Tibshirani R
Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jun; 23(1):70-86. PubMed ID: 12112249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear mixed model selection for false discovery rate control in microarray data analysis.
Demirkale CY; Nettleton D; Maiti T
Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):621-9. PubMed ID: 19522873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
Lai Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian classification and non-Bayesian label estimation via EM algorithm to identify differentially expressed genes: a comparative study.
Antunes M; Sousa L
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):824-36. PubMed ID: 18932140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data.
Grant GR; Liu J; Stoeckert CJ
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2684-90. PubMed ID: 15797908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
