These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17358836)

  • 1. Monogamy inequality for distributed gaussian entanglement.
    Hiroshima T; Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Feb; 98(5):050503. PubMed ID: 17358836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: the Gaussian case.
    Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(15):150501. PubMed ID: 17995148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Entanglement monogamy in three qutrit systems.
    Li Q; Cui J; Wang S; Long GL
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1946. PubMed ID: 28512296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tighter Constraints of Multi-Qubit Entanglement in Terms of Nonconvex Entanglement Measures LCREN and LCRENoA.
    Shen Z; Xuan D; Zhou W; Wang Z; Fei SM
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 Jan; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 38392382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polynomial Monogamy Relations for Entanglement Negativity.
    Allen GW; Meyer DA
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Feb; 118(8):080402. PubMed ID: 28282169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems.
    Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement.
    Osborne TJ; Verstraete F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jun; 96(22):220503. PubMed ID: 16803293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monogamy equalities for qubit entanglement from Lorentz invariance.
    Eltschka C; Siewert J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Apr; 114(14):140402. PubMed ID: 25910095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operational quantification of continuous-variable correlations.
    Rodó C; Adesso G; Sanpera A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Mar; 100(11):110505. PubMed ID: 18517771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantum versus classical correlations in Gaussian states.
    Adesso G; Datta A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Jul; 105(3):030501. PubMed ID: 20867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monogamy relation of multi-qubit systems for squared Tsallis-q entanglement.
    Yuan GM; Song W; Yang M; Li DC; Zhao JL; Cao ZL
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28719. PubMed ID: 27346605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring Gaussian quantum information and correlations using the Rényi entropy of order 2.
    Adesso G; Girolami D; Serafini A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Nov; 109(19):190502. PubMed ID: 23215368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Entanglement monogamy in indistinguishable particle systems.
    Das S; Paul G; Sengupta R
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):21972. PubMed ID: 38081882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Demonstration of Monogamy Relations for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering in Gaussian Cluster States.
    Deng X; Xiang Y; Tian C; Adesso G; He Q; Gong Q; Su X; Xie C; Peng K
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Jun; 118(23):230501. PubMed ID: 28644631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear monogamy of entanglement in three-qubit systems.
    Liu F; Gao F; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16745. PubMed ID: 26568265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantum discord bounds the amount of distributed entanglement.
    Chuan TK; Maillard J; Modi K; Paterek T; Paternostro M; Piani M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(7):070501. PubMed ID: 23006347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantum Correlation Based on Uhlmann Fidelity for Gaussian States.
    Liu L; Hou J; Qi X
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Dec; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33266722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are general quantum correlations monogamous?
    Streltsov A; Adesso G; Piani M; Bruss D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(5):050503. PubMed ID: 23006154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fundamental monogamy relation between contextuality and nonlocality.
    Kurzyński P; Cabello A; Kaszlikowski D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Mar; 112(10):100401. PubMed ID: 24679270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tightening Monogamy and Polygamy Inequalities of Multiqubit Entanglement.
    Farooq A; Ur Rehman J; Jeong Y; Kim JS; Shin H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3314. PubMed ID: 30824827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.