137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17359219)
1. LUMA cervical imaging system.
Kendrick JE; Huh WK; Alvarez RD
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Mar; 4(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 17359219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cytologic correlation between the Bethesda system and colposcopic biopsy].
González Sánchez JL; Pérez Guerrero C; Celorio Aguilera G; Chávez Barambila J; Ríos Montiel FA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1998 Aug; 66():330-4. PubMed ID: 9745194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.
Jordan J; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Schenck U; Baldauf JJ; Da Silva D; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Prendiville W
Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Microcolpohysteroscopy].
Börsch C; Lambrecht E
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Mar; 51(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 2055390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The colposcopy unit. Instrumentation, colposcopic technique, recording of findings, and terminology.
Shier RM
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 20(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 8332311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Precancerous cervical lesions during pregnancy: diagnostic and treatment].
Selleret L; Mathevet P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S131-8. PubMed ID: 18191339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of low-level magnification in visual inspection with acetic acid for the early detection of cervical neoplasia.
Sankaranarayanan R; Shastri SS; Basu P; Mahé C; Mandal R; Amin G; Roy C; Muwonge R; Goswami S; Das P; Chinoy R; Frappart L; Patil S; Choudhury D; Mukherjee T; Dinshaw K
Cancer Detect Prev; 2004; 28(5):345-51. PubMed ID: 15542259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pap smears with reactive cellular changes: a prospective study.
Ding DC; Hsu S; Chen SS; Hsu YH
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):938-40. PubMed ID: 17977169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Squamous cervical lesions in women with human immunodeficiency virus: long-term follow-up.
Massad LS; Seaberg EC; Wright RL; Darragh T; Lee YC; Colie C; Burk R; Strickler HD; Watts DH
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 18515523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology.
Akinola OI; Fabamwo AO; Oshodi YA; Banjo AA; Odusanya O; Gbadegesin A; Tayo A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 17999297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Detection and typing of human papilloma virus by polymerase chain reaction and hybridization assay in cervical samples with cytological abnormalities].
Ergünay K; Misirlioğlu M; Firat P; Tuncer ZS; Tuncer S; Yildiz I; Ustaçelebi S
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2008 Apr; 42(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 18697425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A comparative study of digital colposcope and optical colposcope in the diagnosis of early lesions of uterine cervix].
Zhang W; Huang M; Li S; Wu L; Li N; Zhang X; Pan Q; Shen Y; Qiao Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 24(6):570-2. PubMed ID: 12667328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of follow-up for low-grade cytological abnormalities in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2000-2005.
Benard VB; Howe W; Saraiya M; Helsel W; Lawson HW
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Oct; 12(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 18820545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ensembles of radial basis function networks for spectroscopic detection of cervical precancer.
Tumer K; Ramanujam N; Ghosh J; Richards-Kortum R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):953-61. PubMed ID: 9691570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
