170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17359515)
1. Mobile phone headache: a double blind, sham-controlled provocation study.
Oftedal G; Straume A; Johnsson A; Stovner LJ
Cephalalgia; 2007 May; 27(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 17359515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of 884 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: an experimental provocation study.
Hillert L; Akerstedt T; Lowden A; Wiholm C; Kuster N; Ebert S; Boutry C; Moffat SD; Berg M; Arnetz BB
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Apr; 29(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 18044740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response to 'Comment on mobile phone headache: a double-blind, sham-controlled provocation study'.
Oftedal G; Johnsson A; Stovner LJ; Straume A
Cephalalgia; 2011 Mar; 31(4):508-9. PubMed ID: 21476228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An old issue and a new look: electromagnetic hypersensitivity caused by radiations emitted by GSM mobile phones.
Mortazavi SM; Mahbudi A; Atefi M; Bagheri Sh; Bahaedini N; Besharati A
Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 22129944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cellular phone use does not acutely affect blood pressure or heart rate of humans.
Tahvanainen K; Niño J; Halonen P; Kuusela T; Laitinen T; Länsimies E; Hartikainen J; Hietanen M; Lindholm H
Bioelectromagnetics; 2004 Feb; 25(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 14735556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of GSM and TETRA mobile handset signals on blood pressure, catechol levels and heart rate variability.
Barker AT; Jackson PR; Parry H; Coulton LA; Cook GG; Wood SM
Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Sep; 28(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 17486598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can evidence change belief? Reported mobile phone sensitivity following individual feedback of an inability to discriminate active from sham signals.
Nieto-Hernandez R; Rubin GJ; Cleare AJ; Weinman JA; Wessely S
J Psychosom Res; 2008 Nov; 65(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 18940376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nocebo as headache trigger: evidence from a sham-controlled provocation study with RF fields.
Stovner LJ; Oftedal G; Straume A; Johnsson A
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl; 2008; 188():67-71. PubMed ID: 18439225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of cellular phone use on ear canal temperature measured by NTC thermistors.
Tahvanainen K; Niño J; Halonen P; Kuusela T; Alanko T; Laitinen T; Länsimies E; Hietanen M; Lindholm H
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2007 May; 27(3):162-72. PubMed ID: 17445067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic fields and subjective symptoms: a double-blind study.
Cinel C; Russo R; Boldini A; Fox E
Psychosom Med; 2008 Apr; 70(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 18378872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study.
Nam KC; Lee JH; Noh HW; Cha EJ; Kim NH; Kim DW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Dec; 30(8):641-50. PubMed ID: 19551766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of RF exposure of teenagers and adults by CDMA cellular phones.
Nam KC; Kim SW; Kim SC; Kim DW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Oct; 27(7):509-14. PubMed ID: 16732587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.
Berg-Beckhoff G; Blettner M; Kowall B; Breckenkamp J; Schlehofer B; Schmiedel S; Bornkessel C; Reis U; Potthoff P; Schüz J
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Feb; 66(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 19151228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms.
Wilén J; Johansson A; Kalezic N; Lyskov E; Sandström M
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Apr; 27(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 16304699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study.
Rubin GJ; Hahn G; Everitt BS; Cleare AJ; Wessely S
BMJ; 2006 Apr; 332(7546):886-91. PubMed ID: 16520326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No influence on selected parameters of human visual perception of 1970 MHz UMTS-like exposure.
Schmid G; Sauter C; Stepansky R; Lobentanz IS; Zeitlhofer J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 May; 26(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 15832335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones (GSM 900 and WCDMA/UMTS) on the macrostructure of sleep.
Danker-Hopfe H; Dorn H; Bahr A; Anderer P; Sauter C
J Sleep Res; 2011 Mar; 20(1 Pt 1):73-81. PubMed ID: 20561179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive function and symptoms in adults and adolescents in relation to rf radiation from UMTS base stations.
Riddervold IS; Pedersen GF; Andersen NT; Pedersen AD; Andersen JB; Zachariae R; Mølhave L; Sigsgaard T; Kjaergaard SK
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 May; 29(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 18163423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of short-term W-CDMA mobile phone base station exposure on women with or without mobile phone related symptoms.
Furubayashi T; Ushiyama A; Terao Y; Mizuno Y; Shirasawa K; Pongpaibool P; Simba AY; Wake K; Nishikawa M; Miyawaki K; Yasuda A; Uchiyama M; Yamashita HK; Masuda H; Hirota S; Takahashi M; Okano T; Inomata-Terada S; Sokejima S; Maruyama E; Watanabe S; Taki M; Ohkubo C; Ugawa Y
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Feb; 30(2):100-13. PubMed ID: 18780296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further aspects on cellular and cordless telephones and brain tumours.
Hardell L; Mild KH; Carlberg M
Int J Oncol; 2003 Feb; 22(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 12527940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
