BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17359608)

  • 1. Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes.
    Neal RD; Allgar VL; Ali N; Leese B; Heywood P; Proctor G; Evans J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Mar; 57(536):212-9. PubMed ID: 17359608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urgent GP referrals for suspected lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer.
    Allgar VL; Neal RD; Ali N; Leese B; Heywood P; Proctor G; Evans J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 May; 56(526):355-62. PubMed ID: 16638251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
    Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
    Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stage at diagnosis and early mortality from cancer in England.
    McPhail S; Johnson S; Greenberg D; Peake M; Rous B
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S108-15. PubMed ID: 25734389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
    Eccersley AJ; Wilson EM; Makris A; Novell JR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Mar; 85(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 12648341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
    Trickett JP; Donaldson DR; Bearn PE; Scott HJ; Hassall AC
    Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 15521930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment.
    Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How relevant are ACOG and SGO guidelines for referral of adnexal mass?
    Dearking AC; Aletti GD; McGree ME; Weaver AL; Sommerfield MK; Cliby WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):841-8. PubMed ID: 17906018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.
    Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Travel times to health care and survival from cancers in Northern England.
    Jones AP; Haynes R; Sauerzapf V; Crawford SM; Zhao H; Forman D
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 44(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 17888651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeat 2-week wait referrals for colorectal cancer.
    Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cutting JE; Borley NR; Wheeler JM
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 22776207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of the bowel-screening programme on the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Ayrshire and Arran.
    Roxburgh CS; McTaggart F; Balsitis M; Diament RH
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jan; 15(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 22632378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosing cancer in the bush: a mixed methods study of GP and specialist diagnostic intervals in rural Western Australia.
    Emery JD; Walter FM; Gray V; Sinclair C; Howting D; Bulsara M; Bulsara C; Webster A; Auret K; Saunders C; Nowak A; Holman D
    Fam Pract; 2013 Oct; 30(5):541-50. PubMed ID: 23699107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing diagnostic delay in cancer: a cross-sectional study in three European countries with primary care-led health care systems.
    Murchie P; Campbell NC; Delaney EK; Dinant GJ; Hannaford PC; Johansson L; Lee AJ; Rollano P; Spigt M
    Fam Pract; 2012 Feb; 29(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21828375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of delays in the 2-week-wait cancer referral pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survival in the UK: a modelling study.
    Sud A; Torr B; Jones ME; Broggio J; Scott S; Loveday C; Garrett A; Gronthoud F; Nicol DL; Jhanji S; Boyce SA; Williams M; Riboli E; Muller DC; Kipps E; Larkin J; Navani N; Swanton C; Lyratzopoulos G; McFerran E; Lawler M; Houlston R; Turnbull C
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):1035-1044. PubMed ID: 32702311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
    Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implications of a negative bronchoscopy on waiting times to treatment for lung cancer patients: results of a prospective tracking study.
    Devbhandari MP; Quennell P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 18667329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urgent suspected cancer referrals from general practice: audit of compliance with guidelines and referral outcomes.
    Baughan P; Keatings J; O'Neill B
    Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Nov; 61(592):e700-6. PubMed ID: 22054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delays in treatment in the cancer services: impact on cancer stage and survival.
    Comber H; Cronin DP; Deady S; Lorcain PO; Riordan P
    Ir Med J; 2005 Sep; 98(8):238-9. PubMed ID: 16255115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delays in the assessment and management of primary lung cancers in South Auckland.
    Sood JD; Wong C; Bevan R; Veale A; Sivakumaran P
    N Z Med J; 2009 May; 122(1294):42-50. PubMed ID: 19465946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.