BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1735965)

  • 1. Auditory distortion products measured with averaged auditory evoked potentials.
    Chertoff ME; Hecox KE; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 1735965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The auditory evoked potential difference tone and cubic difference tone measured from the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla.
    Arnold S; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1565-73. PubMed ID: 9745739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory nonlinearities measured with auditory-evoked potentials.
    Chertoff ME; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1248-54. PubMed ID: 2324391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
    Wittekindt A; Gaese BH; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological evidence of nonlinear distortion products to two-tone stimuli.
    Rickman MD; Chertoff ME; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2818-26. PubMed ID: 1918625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inner hair cell responses to the 2f1-f2 intermodulation distortion product.
    Nuttall AL; Dolan DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):782-90. PubMed ID: 2307775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.
    Harris FP; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Stagner BB; Coats AC; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 2921404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Otoacoustic distortion products in adults with normal hearing].
    Simoncelli C; Molini E; Ricci G; Capolunghi B; Alunni N
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1995 Apr; 15(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 8928654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slow variation of the amplitude of acoustic distortion at f2-f1 in awake rabbits.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 2032963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.