These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1735965)

  • 21. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 8880185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Origin of the bell-like dependence of the DPOAE amplitude on primary frequency ratio.
    Lukashkin AN; Russell IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3097-106. PubMed ID: 11785811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of low-frequency whole-body vibration under different visual conditions on auditory evoked potentials.
    Seidel H; Schuster U; Menzel G; Ullsperger P; Blüthner R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Jul; 9(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 2365597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Studies of interaural attenuation to investigate the validity of a dichotic difference tone response recorded from the inferior colliculus in the chinchilla.
    Arnold S; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1541-7. PubMed ID: 10738808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intermodulation components in inner hair cell and organ of Corti responses.
    Cheatham MA; Dallos P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Aug; 102(2 Pt 1):1038-48. PubMed ID: 9265752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.
    Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory nerve neurophonic produced by the frequency difference of two simultaneously presented tones.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8970823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neural correlates of cubic difference tones in the medial geniculate body of the cat.
    Horner K; de Ribaupierre Y; de Ribaupierre F
    Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 11(3):343-57. PubMed ID: 6630087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard.
    Rosowski JJ; Peake WT; White JR
    Hear Res; 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 6715262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements.
    Allen JB; Fahey PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):809-16. PubMed ID: 8370887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved.
    Puel JL; Rebillard G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1630-5. PubMed ID: 2341667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
    Formby C; Sachs RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency-related differences in the speed of human auditory processing.
    Woods DL; Alain C; Covarrubias D; Zaidel O
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8473245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distortion in the cochlea: acoustic f2-f1 at low stimulus levels.
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1993 Nov; 70(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 8294260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.