114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1735969)
1. Coupling of FM systems to individuals with unilateral hearing loss.
Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG; Carney E; Schulte L
J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 1735969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
Kim H; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs - all a matter of opening the ear canal?
Denk F; Hieke T; Roberz M; Husstedt H
Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 35254186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of vent effects between a solid earmold and a hollow earmold.
Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):480-91. PubMed ID: 19764168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.
Kuk FK
J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jan; 5(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8155894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probe tube systems: effects of equalization on real ear insertion and aided gain.
Moskal NL; Goldstein DP
Ear Hear; 1992 Feb; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 1541373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and coupler gains.
Zemplenyi J; Dirks D; Gilman S
J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 4046580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Imaging for Obtaining Ear Impressions for Hearing Aid Fitting.
Chen CK; Hsieh LC; Chiang YC; Cheng WD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):666-671. PubMed ID: 31060451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems.
Kiessling J; Brenner B; Jespersen CT; Groth J; Jensen OD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):237-49. PubMed ID: 16050334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.
Gilman S; Dirks DD
Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 6719011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of FM systems with an ear canal probe tube microphone system.
Hawkins DB
Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 3678646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.
Feigin JA; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 1989 Aug; 10(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 2776986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations.
Munro KJ; Buttfield LM
Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 15937410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outer ear canal sound pressure and bone vibration measurement in SSD and CHL patients using a transcutaneous bone conduction instrument.
Ghoncheh M; Lilli G; Lenarz T; Maier H
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():161-168. PubMed ID: 26723102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of occluded ear impedances on the eardrum SPL produced by hearing aids.
Gilman S; Dirks DD; Stern R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Aug; 70(2):370-86. PubMed ID: 7288025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of recent hearing aid improvements on management of the hearing impaired.
Cashman M; Corbin H; Riko K; Rossman R
J Otolaryngol; 1984 Aug; 13(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 6471158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures.
Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of probe tube insertion depth on spectral measures of speech.
Caldwell M; Souza PE; Tremblay KL
Trends Amplif; 2006 Sep; 10(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 16959735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
