These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1735969)

  • 1. Coupling of FM systems to individuals with unilateral hearing loss.
    Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG; Carney E; Schulte L
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 1735969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs - all a matter of opening the ear canal?
    Denk F; Hieke T; Roberz M; Husstedt H
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 35254186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of vent effects between a solid earmold and a hollow earmold.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):480-91. PubMed ID: 19764168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.
    Kuk FK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jan; 5(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8155894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probe tube systems: effects of equalization on real ear insertion and aided gain.
    Moskal NL; Goldstein DP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Feb; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 1541373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and coupler gains.
    Zemplenyi J; Dirks D; Gilman S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 4046580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Imaging for Obtaining Ear Impressions for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Chen CK; Hsieh LC; Chiang YC; Cheng WD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):666-671. PubMed ID: 31060451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems.
    Kiessling J; Brenner B; Jespersen CT; Groth J; Jensen OD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):237-49. PubMed ID: 16050334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 6719011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of FM systems with an ear canal probe tube microphone system.
    Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 3678646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.
    Feigin JA; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 1989 Aug; 10(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 2776986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations.
    Munro KJ; Buttfield LM
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 15937410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outer ear canal sound pressure and bone vibration measurement in SSD and CHL patients using a transcutaneous bone conduction instrument.
    Ghoncheh M; Lilli G; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():161-168. PubMed ID: 26723102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of an integrated pressure level measured earmold wideband real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement.
    Urichuk M; Purcell D; Allen P; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Aug; 63(8):604-612. PubMed ID: 37722804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of occluded ear impedances on the eardrum SPL produced by hearing aids.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD; Stern R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Aug; 70(2):370-86. PubMed ID: 7288025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of recent hearing aid improvements on management of the hearing impaired.
    Cashman M; Corbin H; Riko K; Rossman R
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Aug; 13(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 6471158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures.
    Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.