These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17359926)

  • 1. Light truck vehicles (LTVs) contribution to rear-end collisions.
    Harb R; Radwan E; Yan X; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17359926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis and prediction of traffic fatalities resulting from angle collisions including the effect of vehicles' configuration and compatibility.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):457-69. PubMed ID: 15003591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crash fatality and vehicle incompatibility in collisions between cars and light trucks or vans.
    Ossiander EM; Koepsell TD; McKnight B
    Inj Prev; 2014 Dec; 20(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 24835235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of vehicle model and driver behavior on risk.
    Wenzel TP; Ross M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 May; 37(3):479-94. PubMed ID: 15784202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Passenger car collision fatalities--with special emphasis on collisions with heavy vehicles.
    Björnstig U; Björnstig J; Eriksson A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 18215544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of replacing heavy passenger vehicles (LTVs and SUVs) in the British Columbia fleet with lighter versions.
    Cooper PJ; Zheng Y; Andersen L; Pellegrini N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Oct; 10(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 19746310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
    Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator.
    Broughton KL; Switzer F; Scott D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 16962059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of experience and electronic stability control on low friction collision avoidance in a truck driving simulator.
    Markkula G; Benderius O; Wolff K; Wahde M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1266-77. PubMed ID: 23122327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
    Muhrer E; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of teen driver fatality rates by vehicle type in the United States.
    Trowbridge MJ; McKay MP; Maio RF
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(10):850-5. PubMed ID: 17898248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study.
    de Waard D; Kruizinga A; Brookhuis KA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):818-28. PubMed ID: 18329437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of work zone rear-end crash risk for different vehicle-following patterns.
    Weng J; Meng Q; Yan X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():449-57. PubMed ID: 25150525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions.
    DeLucia PR; Tharanathan A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):334-50. PubMed ID: 20025419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating rear-end accident probabilities at signalized intersections: a comparison study of intersections with and without green signal countdown devices.
    Ni Y; Li K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 24867568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.