163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17359926)
1. Light truck vehicles (LTVs) contribution to rear-end collisions.
Harb R; Radwan E; Yan X; Abdel-Aty M
Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17359926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis and prediction of traffic fatalities resulting from angle collisions including the effect of vehicles' configuration and compatibility.
Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):457-69. PubMed ID: 15003591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crash fatality and vehicle incompatibility in collisions between cars and light trucks or vans.
Ossiander EM; Koepsell TD; McKnight B
Inj Prev; 2014 Dec; 20(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 24835235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of vehicle model and driver behavior on risk.
Wenzel TP; Ross M
Accid Anal Prev; 2005 May; 37(3):479-94. PubMed ID: 15784202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Passenger car collision fatalities--with special emphasis on collisions with heavy vehicles.
Björnstig U; Björnstig J; Eriksson A
Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 18215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of replacing heavy passenger vehicles (LTVs and SUVs) in the British Columbia fleet with lighter versions.
Cooper PJ; Zheng Y; Andersen L; Pellegrini N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Oct; 10(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 19746310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator.
Broughton KL; Switzer F; Scott D
Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 16962059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of experience and electronic stability control on low friction collision avoidance in a truck driving simulator.
Markkula G; Benderius O; Wolff K; Wahde M
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1266-77. PubMed ID: 23122327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
Muhrer E; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
Young MS; Stanton NA
Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
Shah D; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of teen driver fatality rates by vehicle type in the United States.
Trowbridge MJ; McKay MP; Maio RF
Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(10):850-5. PubMed ID: 17898248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study.
de Waard D; Kruizinga A; Brookhuis KA
Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):818-28. PubMed ID: 18329437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of work zone rear-end crash risk for different vehicle-following patterns.
Weng J; Meng Q; Yan X
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():449-57. PubMed ID: 25150525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions.
DeLucia PR; Tharanathan A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):334-50. PubMed ID: 20025419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating rear-end accident probabilities at signalized intersections: a comparison study of intersections with and without green signal countdown devices.
Ni Y; Li K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 24867568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
