These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17360285)

  • 1. Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD; Houde A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1317-24. PubMed ID: 17360285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?
    Evans JP; Simmons LW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution and significance of male mate choice.
    Edward DA; Chapman T
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):647-54. PubMed ID: 21890230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
    Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)?
    Klappert K; Reinhold K
    Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 17720463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than "good genes".
    Prokop ZM; Michalczyk Ł; Drobniak SM; Herdegen M; Radwan J
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2665-73. PubMed ID: 22946794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.
    Gosden TP; Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2106-12. PubMed ID: 25078542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1395-402. PubMed ID: 17374595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.