These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17360294)
1. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test. Oyer DS; Saxon D; Shah A Endocr Pract; 2007; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17360294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Jayaprakash P; Bhansali A; Bhansali S; Dutta P; Anantharaman R; Shanmugasundar G; Ravikiran M Indian J Med Res; 2011 Jun; 133(6):645-9. PubMed ID: 21727664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choosing a Vibratory Test to Pair With Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing for Evaluating Lower Extremity Sensation in Patients With Diabetes: A Comparison of Three Vibratory Methodologies. Raymond B; Steriovski J; Gillyard K; Yang C; Wu SC; Crews RT J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31113243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolated use of vibration perception thresholds and semmes-weinstein monofilament in diagnosing diabetic polyneuropathy: "the North Catalonia diabetes study". Jurado J; Ybarra J; Pou JM Nurs Clin North Am; 2007 Mar; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 17270590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-invasive assessment of vibration perception and protective sensation in people with diabetes mellitus: inter- and intra-rater reliability. Lanting SM; Spink MJ; Tehan PE; Vickers S; Casey SL; Chuter VH J Foot Ankle Res; 2020; 13():3. PubMed ID: 31988664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobile phone generated vibrations used to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. May JD; Morris MWJ Foot Ankle Surg; 2017 Dec; 23(4):281-284. PubMed ID: 29202988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a new device in the assessment of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes. Bracewell N; Game F; Jeffcoate W; Scammell BE Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1553-5. PubMed ID: 22672257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork as a predictor of diabetic polyneuropathy compared with a neurothesiometer. Kästenbauer T; Sauseng S; Brath H; Abrahamian H; Irsigler K Diabet Med; 2004 Jun; 21(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 15154940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Methods for Detection of Diabetic Sensory Neuropathy. Arshad AR; Alvi KY J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):374-9. PubMed ID: 27225141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Neuropad in the Assessment of Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Versus the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, 10g Monofilament Application and Biothesiometer Measurement. Zografou I; Iliadis F; Sambanis C; Didangelos T Curr Vasc Pharmacol; 2020; 18(5):517-522. PubMed ID: 31340739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Difficulties in screening for peripheral neuropathies in children with diabetes. Hirschfeld G; von Glischinski M; Knop C; Wiesel T; Reinehr T; Aksu F; Blankenburg M; Hirsch J; Zernikow B Diabet Med; 2015 Jun; 32(6):786-9. PubMed ID: 25640325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements. McGill M; Molyneaux L; Spencer R; Heng LF; Yue DK Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of sensory testing on different toe surfaces: implications for neuropathy screening. Dimitrakoudis D; Bril V Neurology; 2002 Aug; 59(4):611-3. PubMed ID: 12196660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of Vibratip in accurate identification of loss of protective sensation in the contralateral foot of patients admitted with a diabetic foot ulcer. Pasangha E; George B; Jayalakshmi V; Devi P; Ayyar V; Bantwal G Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2021; 15(3):857-862. PubMed ID: 33873055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An initial evaluation of a proof-of-concept 128-Hz electronic tuning fork in the detection of peripheral neuropathy. O'Brien T; Karem J J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 24725032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel robotic monofilament test for diabetic neuropathy. Wilasrusmee C; Suthakorn J; Guerineau C; Itsarachaiyot Y; Sa-Ing V; Proprom N; Lertsithichai P; Jirasisrithum S; Kittur D Asian J Surg; 2010 Oct; 33(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 21377106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship Between Glycated Hemoglobin and Vibration Perception Threshold in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Maiya AG; Parameshwar A; Hande M; Nandalike V Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2020 Jun; 19(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 31838926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hidden dangers revealed by misdiagnosed diabetic neuropathy: A comparison of simple clinical tests for the screening of vibration perception threshold at primary care level. Azzopardi K; Gatt A; Chockalingam N; Formosa C Prim Care Diabetes; 2018 Apr; 12(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29029862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication. Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]