These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17361058)

  • 1. Design of a DICOM image-based program for estimating patient exposure dose in computed tomography.
    Yamamoto S; Horiuchi T; Sekiguchi J; Wada S; Komizu M; Yamaguchi T
    Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 17361058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic computed tomography patient dose calculation using DICOM header metadata.
    Jahnen A; Kohler S; Hermen J; Tack D; Back C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):317-20. PubMed ID: 21831868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Software for the estimation of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Osei EK; Barnett R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 19690363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current status of patient radiation doses from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
    Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 16461483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.
    Kalender WA; Schmidt B; Zankl M; Schmidt M
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 10087133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cloud-Based CT Dose Monitoring using the DICOM-Structured Report: Fully Automated Analysis in Regard to National Diagnostic Reference Levels.
    Boos J; Meineke A; Rubbert C; Heusch P; Lanzman RS; Aissa J; Antoch G; Kröpil P
    Rofo; 2016 Mar; 188(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 26632871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
    McCollough CH
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation doses to patients during selected CT procedures at four hospitals in Tanzania.
    Muhogora WE; Nyanda AM; Ngoye WM; Shao D
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 16165335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraction of CT dose information from DICOM metadata: automated Matlab-based approach.
    Dave JK; Gingold EL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):142-5. PubMed ID: 23255754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient dose from CT: a literature review.
    Colang JE; Killion JB; Vano E
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 79(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 17848530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Development of a universal interface for the exchange of medical image data using magneto-optical media].
    Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Newe A; Donnerstag F; Zumkeller M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004; 49(1-2):6-10. PubMed ID: 15032491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated effective dose estimation in CT.
    García MS; Cameán MP; Busto RL; Vega VL; Sueiro JM; Martínez CO; del Río JR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jan; 138(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 19783556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control.
    Kalra MK; Naz N; Rizzo SM; Blake MA
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2005; 34(5):171-81. PubMed ID: 16129235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager.
    Gelfand MJ; Lemen LC
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 37(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 17707244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.